673 () posted 3 years ago by FreedomloverUK 3 years ago by FreedomloverUK +674 / -1 51 comments share 51 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Looks like whoever wrote the article probably jumped the gun and now has to backtrack.
The epoch times is reporting the same thing. May 28th meeting date.
The article is behind a paywall though, but I copied it into this comment.
https://patriots.win/p/12igmEqbrD/x/c/4E0yJALGePx
Thanks!
80% read only headlines
I admit that's what I do. If I'm "interested" I'll go ahead and read the article. Sometimes you only need to read a few paragraphs to see the "slant" of the piece.
The change is weird, if the it came from the judge he can back out depending on the death threats he gets from the [DS].
It began as may allow, as it was under consideration. The judge has since approved this.