As much as I loath modern banks, there's sorta reasons why this would be the case. The major one would be if they thought there was some reason that your finances would be unreliable and thus they'd be left holding the bag having to incur the losses associated with trying to sell a house, whereas a landlord really only cares about your short term finances.
Thanks. I've never heard of that. Yeah, guess I was lucky that my doctor didn't say anything about that.
Huh. I was never given tylenol after getting any sort of vaccine. Baffling.
You're also seeing those values rapidly increase right now, especially among metals. I know on my watchlist palladium, gold, copper, and platinum have all started to break upwards. It's baffling how many people don't see the signs of an economic crash here. When gold starts zooming and stocks start going down, as we reach insane inflation, boy, makes a fella wonder...
Because if it looks like a Soros, and walks like a Goldstein, and talks like a Psaki, it may have a shekel or two.
"Comprehensive lesson plans" massive kek. From my old college, I can tell you most professors don't give a fuck. Organic chemistry was taught from slides the professor found online, and that's at the college level.
I thought Q was always a team of people, never just one individual? Seems bizarre.
You see this all the time on these platforms. I look at WSbets occasionally and all the time somebody will say something about the financial system being primed to collapse, or biden shitting the bed, and the responses will just be things like 'gay bear' or 'well, all the presidents suck' 'Trump was worse.' All just sort of programmed, low effort responses so they don't actually have to challenge any ideas.
Yeah, that's the point. If you read Truth Social's terms of service, it explicitly bans "Posts that include harassment, bullying, hate speech, and spam." Which is a terrible start.
Now just get rid of the rules on "hate speech" and the platform might be trustable. Sorry, I get 4d chess and all that, but those rules never work.
And we all know who did him in, in the end. You guessed it, Frank Stallone.
Yeah, the man was a treasure, and his Bill Clinton segment on the View might be some of the greatest television of all time.
The dark chocolate will knife fight the other dark chocolate in their next ad. It will be very diverse and inclusive.
Calling it useless is an absolute psyop, it's horrifically damaging to any value we hold dear. It's like when people are trained to complain about gov 'not doing anything' instead of looking at all the things they are doing that's fucking you over.
I can notice statistical trends and also not want some random guy having violence committed against him. That's the difference between a collectivist and an individual thinker.
Yup. I don't know if it's true that Gorsuch cared about that doctrine at all, but if he did, that's incredibly retarded and telling that he wouldn't simply oppose it for being obviously unconstitutional.
Yeah, I have similar thoughts. It would be wonderful, but if I had to put odds on it, probably just a means for pushing against personal freedom rather than them trying to oppose a specific threat they see.
Could just be generic fearmongering as always, but this could very well be one of those catalysts for change that we are looking for. A lot would need to happen for the court to ever make a ruling like this (especially given how most seem cabal) and so I don't have much to say for this other than them freaking out makes me happy.
Going back to the original poster I saw this from, the said it was on Telegram (major red flags from that of course) so link to that poster for more info here: https://stocktwits.com/AlwayzLONGnvrSHRT/message/425814407
I'm not going to defend any of this guy's behavior, because he sounds like the typical Hollywood monster, but just specifically that newborn comment could have worked with like some really raunchy comedian in the right context. It's almost a Norm Macdonald set up, as much as the comparison pains me, when asked for to recant and he says that it should have been $5, which reminds me a lot of the Norm Bill Clinton set up on the View. Basically, if that one sentence existed on its own for an otherwise decent seeming human being, I would probably be grossed out, but I would see the comedic structure to it.
I think this is instagram, but I have to admit to being a boomer in a zoomer's body when it comes to big tech, and I saw this posted in a stock forum. I wasn't able to find anything on her social media. If this is real, it would be pretty massive, but it does seem too good to be true.
But those numbers are entirely wrong. He said 9-10 million and even by Fauci fraud data we aren't even close to that, and 2021 is over. So either something interrupted that plan or more likely, this random faggot made a vague prediction that just so happened to line up in the broadest of strokes to the current situation.
Absolutely true, but some places try to use that shit, like universities. They have all your info on record and are happy to use it as leverage.
While accurate, a lot of times this is used to erroneously argue that we could therefore increase the population on Earth with current tech by like an order of magnitude, which ignores the massive quantities of land required to feed all those people.