... and I told him, no. Then, he asked me if I was planning on getting it, and I said, no. To my way of thinking, this should have been the end of the conversation, but it wasn't. He then asks me what was stopping me from getting the vaccine. So, I started out easy with him and said, "Well, legally, this isn't even a vaccine." He agreed and went into the mRNA explanation. A little nervous laughter punctuated what he was saying. Then I mentioned how this was only given experimental approval from the FDA and not full approval. More nervous laughter and more agreement. I thought this would end the conversation, but he kept pressing me, which was beginning to annoy me. I assured him I had done my research and I didn't like what I had discovered. He wanted to know even more, so I dropped the MOAB on him. I told him I knew all about the NIH and Fauci working on gain of function research and then sending the experiment overseas to the Wuhan lab...and that I was aware of all of this LAST YEAR. Now, I got some very nervous laughter from the doctor.
And, just like that.....BOOM!....he immediately changed the subject.
Even if they eventually call it (legally) a vaccine, it will never be a true vaccine. The concept of a vaccine is to take a little bit of a virus, inject it into a person, the person's own body creates natural antibodies against it, and stay for life so that if they are exposed to that virus in the future, they will be less sick or not sick.
Never mind that this theory has never actually been proven. NEVER. Set that aside. This new "mRNA" thing is NOT a vaccine. There is NO virus in it -- alive or dead. CDC has NO SAMPLES TO GIVE. Instead, they created a lab drug that "tells your body" to produce antibodies. There is NO PROOF that your body reacts to this artifical drug in the same way it would a virus in your body.
It is not a vaccine, and never will be, because it cannot be. (They will just change the legal/medical definition of "vaccine," but that does not change the facts.)