I was going over the drops again and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked here: Is there any part of the Q universe that you disagree with?
For me, its this:
No coincidences
I personally believe in coincidences: I think they happen every day and we all experience them, and I think it's wise to recognize coincidence as a possibility. Like Ian Fleming wrote: *If it is once, it's happenstance, it can happen. If it is twice, it is a coincidence. And if it is thrice, it's a conspiracy." I think coincidences CAN be exposed as intentional, but arent automatically a sign of a greater scheme.
Hope I dont get banned for this, just interested in where everybody's head is at. Does anyone have that one Q bit they disagree with?
I dont think Q says no coincidences. Q says how many coincidences before it's mathematically impossible
There is “before mathematically impossible”.....
And there is .....
No Coincidences .....
..... BIBLICAL .....
Always Above
Definitely says a lot about mathematically impossible coincidences, but there are a few flat-out "no coincidence" lines:
https://qposts.online/?q=no+coincidences&s=keyword