I was going over the drops again and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked here: Is there any part of the Q universe that you disagree with?
For me, its this:
No coincidences
I personally believe in coincidences: I think they happen every day and we all experience them, and I think it's wise to recognize coincidence as a possibility. Like Ian Fleming wrote: *If it is once, it's happenstance, it can happen. If it is twice, it is a coincidence. And if it is thrice, it's a conspiracy." I think coincidences CAN be exposed as intentional, but arent automatically a sign of a greater scheme.
Hope I dont get banned for this, just interested in where everybody's head is at. Does anyone have that one Q bit they disagree with?
Actually, 'No Coincidences' is something really true by itself, if you look at the wide picture of life and existence, what we call 'meaningful' coincidences is nothing more than a variation of synchronicity and synchronic events, there's a deep explanation behind this, but it's a topic that goes quite deep in the metaphysical, i had a good article about synchronicity lines on earth and explanation on how those extend tru the whole universe / cosmos, hopefully i still have it saved around, i'll edit the post if i find it