I was going over the drops again and I don't think I've ever seen this question asked here: Is there any part of the Q universe that you disagree with?
For me, its this:
No coincidences
I personally believe in coincidences: I think they happen every day and we all experience them, and I think it's wise to recognize coincidence as a possibility. Like Ian Fleming wrote: *If it is once, it's happenstance, it can happen. If it is twice, it is a coincidence. And if it is thrice, it's a conspiracy." I think coincidences CAN be exposed as intentional, but arent automatically a sign of a greater scheme.
Hope I dont get banned for this, just interested in where everybody's head is at. Does anyone have that one Q bit they disagree with?
You know I always thought that it's necessarily that there are thing s I don't trust, but I'm quite sure I read a Q post apologising for necessary misdirection/misinformation.
There are layers of truths, half truths and outright misdirections.
I believe the Q team has revealed more than we actually know, but we are missing the keys to completely unlock it.
Lots of theories floating about.
I'm currently going over the Law of War theory. Very interesting stuff.