He's there to tie audits to Q in the most flakey way possible so as to give the MSM something they can shoot at.
Take the above message for instance. It makes a statement of fact with no supporting evidence presented.
But this wasn't his most important post ever. He said that his most important post ever was a link to some NeonRevolt drivel, another namefaggot who insists you know his name in this movement of anonimity.
So by this logic, you can't speak to any of your friends about any theories and you better get your x22 VPN protection so nobody can track your internet movements. C'mon man!
CodeMonkeyZ is a bad actor.
He's there to tie audits to Q in the most flakey way possible so as to give the MSM something they can shoot at.
Take the above message for instance. It makes a statement of fact with no supporting evidence presented.
But this wasn't his most important post ever. He said that his most important post ever was a link to some NeonRevolt drivel, another namefaggot who insists you know his name in this movement of anonimity.
Is CodeMonkeyZ anon? Do you know his name?
If you know his name, how can he be anon?
The Q movement is anonymous.
If you know their name, they're not anon.
Q set it up that way to prevent the movement can't be hijacked by bad actors.
Like Corsi, or "microchip", or NeonRevolt, or this guy:
https://www.businessinsider.com/q-shaman-qanon-influencer-capitol-siege-washington-dc-protest-riot-2021-1
or this guy:
https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/crime-and-courts/2021/01/11/what-we-know-doug-jensen-iowan-arrested-fbi-after-capitol-riot/6616476002/
One of the most basic truths of the Q movement is there is Q and there are anons.
Anyone with room temperature IQ could discern that if you go on HBO to become the face of the Q movement, you're not anon.
"If you know their name, they're not anon."
So by this logic, you can't speak to any of your friends about any theories and you better get your x22 VPN protection so nobody can track your internet movements. C'mon man!
I think this means if people talk and cant support the claims then they are bad actors.
If someone is talking to their friends and goes into unverified rumors or date fags then yes that person could be making himself a bad actor.