None of them have condemned the vaccine. None of them have warned you it is poison. None of them have told you to avoid it.
(I am not taking the vaccine, because I don't think it is necessary, but I also know that Trump is not allowing the world to be poisoned or genetically mutated without warning us.)
Reconcile these truths with our suspicion and fear of the vaccine. Trump was responsible for Operation Warp Speed, the program that brought the vaccine to the public in record time. Trump does not want anyone forced to take the vaccine, but he has repeatedly endorsed them, and taken credit for the program (Warp Speed) that brought the vaccine to the world.
So, if the vaccine is poison, you are saying Trump and the Patriots are responsible. OR, you have to admit, like I did, that my suspicion of new vaccines and what Gates and Fauci would LIKE to do, was played on by the same fear mongers who want us to live in fear. A shill's favorite tools are: FUD. FUD is Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt or Doom (your choice.)
Spreading FUD makes us lose trust in Trump. Spreading FUD makes us doubt Trump. Spreading FUD causes division and fear - and makes us lose our sense of logical thinking, of using discernment. They got me. Then I woke up. I was a little embarrassed that I was tricked again by these B*stards. They watch the boards, they listen, they are here, and they comment. They take a half truth and exploit it, and amplify it. We know this.
Bottom line. Trump would be responsible for poisoning and genetically mutating millions and millions of people worldwide. Do you think he is doing that?
Relax, and Enjoy the show. Patriots are in Control.
I get that, but at the same time, if I knew your whole family had to die for me to complete my objective, and you were part of my plan, and I didn't tell you about it because I knew I wouldn't complete my objective without you, would you be ok with that?
Supporting something that might be harmful (rarely according to the data) is NOT the same thing as your statement. Trying to equate the two is disingenuous.
Im just speculating, but you're still down playing it.
Downplaying the severity of the vaccine, or downplaying the role of supporting something harmful?
The vaccine does not appear to be that harmful. By "that harmful" I mean the data does not support the conclusion that a substantial portion of the population will be harmed by it. Having said that, the data does suggest it could be numbered in the millions who die from the vaccine world wide. That is a high estimate, and dependent on a mild pathogenic priming (ADE) response. The ADE casualties could be zero for all I know, which would reduce the total death from vaccines likely in the hundreds of thousands and not millions (WW).
These projections are based on current data, reports of VAERS accuracy and scientific papers. I am a biologist and data scientist. These are guesses, but they are educated guesses.
These numbers seem like a lot, but when you look at past communist takeovers they are really low numbers. A successful WW communist takeover would likely result in hundreds of millions, maybe even billions of deaths. So reducing that result down to a few hundred thousand or even a few million is substantial.
If you mean I am downplaying the role of supporting something harmful:
This is war. It is a war of disinformation. Do people die from disinformation? Yes. Can people dying be actually saving people? Yes.
But it is an important distinction I made above. You were putting forth the hypothetical of killing off your whole family to achieve victory. I am suggesting that supporting something that might kill a few people is fundamentally completely different than will kill "your whole family" and that equating the two is a nonstarter.
Having said that, if I were in charge I would choose the path that lead to victory that saved more people than any other path. I support anyone or any path that supports that ideal.
This is war. I do not expect myself or anyone I care about to survive, though I will try to ensure that result.
This makes sense. However, in this context, what is the rationale for President Trump himself to say that people can make their own choice, but then recommend that people get the injection? That is confusing, to say the least.