I am looking for a quick ELI5 explanation to tell my friends and family why the AZ forensic audit is needed if “all these previous judges said there was no basis for a hearing on election fraud” (Their words, not mine)
I don’t have a quick explanation for them and they throw this in my face constantly.
Thank you kindly.
It could have been because, objectively, there wasn’t enough evidence of widespread fraud.
...but, that’s ridiculous. I don’t think it’s possible for our beloved Trump to have lost to anyone, albeit an octogenarian dementia patient, so the more likely explanation is that every single one of those judges were corrupt, and were receiving bribes to rule in favor of the demoncrats.
Have you looked through here? https://hereistheevidence.com/
Have you read these documents? https://got-freedom.org/evidence/
Have you watched Mike Lindell's documentary series? https://lindelltv.com/
Have you seen this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J66DB6lu-mg
How about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3oEkrwqyNo
Do you remember when hundreds of thousands of ballots were counted after they stopped counting?
Please answer, what possible evidence would you need?
Edit: Here is a great video - is this not evidence? https://www.bitchute.com/video/WNLxq4A2Oo1z/