It really looks like Maricopa is going to open a dam, but what does this mean? Is there any legal precedent?
Let's leave aside the presidential race. I don't think there is any legal precedent there for a stolen election, or, if there is, it certainly goes back a ways. What about the congressional elections and other elections? Would this mean special elections, or just swapping the people out, or what? Any lawfags out there with sauce?
Too mild. We have all the evidence needed to convict (thanks Adm Rodgers & others).
This global, criminal cabal, which is inflicting all this misery on us, needs to be exterminated. There'll be a Great Global Reset for sure; however, not as those bastards intended. Think how much good we could do for each other when we get our bazallion$$ back, all bank debts cancelled, no more income tax. #NESARAGESARA. Signed in 1963-ish?
True. Arrests would eliminate many courtroom battles over ambiguous constitutional election laws. But arrests would have stopped the fraud election from ever happening in the first place, so why didn't that happen already? My guess, traitors within the republican party establishment prevented it.
Arrests only work if there are people with authority willing to make those arrests. Perhaps we need to find legal council to advise the public on how we the people can legally exert our right to make citizen arrests against legitimate criminals? Perhaps a crowd funded operation to hire lawyers, and legal scholars to advise the public on our legal rights to arrest criminals...
Remember when we have been told many times by numerous people: "It had to be this way".
Because letting them complete the fraud was part of the plan from the beginning?