In this very chat here, YOUTUBE TV LIVE (a member of the George Team) explains where their super chats go to:
Terri TarHeel: What do you do with the chat donations?
YOUTUBE TV LIVE: Chat donations go to Veritas and or T45... YT does however keep 30 percent.
Now, would a paytriot tell their audience, "Hey look, 30% of your superchats go to YouTube"? No, because then their audience would then think twice about giving such a large cut to YouTube, who has no business in generating the recipient's content, via the superchat system. Okay, then maybe they might want to send funds directly through a fundraising platform? That might be the case if only there were one for George News, but there are none! I have never heard of a paytriot that relies only on their merch and their superchats to receive their funds without some other fundraising platforms.
You dig up old allegations that don't hold much weight. The "pictures that other website", Alamy I assume, is one that is flawed. Those images are public domain images found on the WH45 Archive Flickr that George promised to upload on January 13, 2021 (Second compilation, timestamp 20:26) [2] and delivered on February 4, 2021 [7], well before anyone thought of them as paytriots. It could very well be that they owned the rights to those images directly, and before the archive was active they distributed those photos to SMG. Then the DVIDS video issue is more nuanced, but I believe George News bypasses DVIDS by way of direct involvement with the DoD. I can't prove it because I am not a party to that arrangement, and I won't be a fool to try as that one rogue mod did.
The comments on the Telegram do turn on during when the Chat Line is live to field questions or general opinion. The number of messages the receive during that time is enormous and number thousands in one hour. If left on for a longer duration that number could surpass millions, and there ain't no one who has the time or energy to sift through a million messages.
Well, maybe that's not what you're saying, that they shut it off to avoid having to answer questions about DVIDS and Alamy images during that time. Well, those are legal and licensing matters, and you can't answer those kinds of matters on a scale of hundreds or thousands simultaneously without being first prepared not to implicate yourself in a lawsuit prepared by some internet strangers. And you see, the ones who asked had a preconception bias that GN were the ones doing wrong, and that they were going to prove them guilty. "We're just asking a question," they claimed. No they weren't, they were no better than the journalists who asked Trump "simple questions" and either never wrote his answer or take his answer and cut up the bit that flattered him least.
There are plenty here on GA who either think highly of GN or take a "Let's watch, wait and see" approach, and give no weight to the allegations raised by that one rogue mod, and they are the ones who have asked me to continue these compilations in spite of the drama.
I just watched you list all of the reasons you have rationalized believing in GN. That is OK. What ever makes you, and supporters extremely happy and gives you hopium. Be my guest. I do feel advertising tshirts is a form of profit. I do feel with enough following, donations will be made regardless of what you say about you tube.
Now. Unless you have proof the donations go to veritas and T45, please allow me to remain skeptical. It would be far far far too easy for someone who did enough research and knew enough about Q to theoretically create a well meaning, but subtly sneaky, and cryptic following.
And that is why I say read at your own risk.
Now put the diatribe to go use and go redpill someone. I am your friend here. This is a place where skepticism is a criterial tool in our digital war. Manipulation is a tool in theirs.
Thank you for your concern. I do this in the full awareness that maybe, just maybe you are right and they really are masterful manipulators and profiteers.
I also understand that the number of calculations that must be made in order to maintain a "false GN" is astronomical. I am thus skeptical of the skepticism on that basis.
I also have more trust in my fellow patriots and am always willing to given them the benefit of a doubt. I also agree that there is also always something that I call "a donation economy", where people will buy merch and give donations just to contribute to a specific project like GN, but I look at it as GN making sure their audience is not preyed upon by imposters posing as them. I thus look also to the possibility that maybe, maybe you are wrong and the really are true, well-intentioned, legitimate patriots.
But look. I do not go around spreading words of caution that suggest the figures that you have supported are maybe, maybe paytriots, based on something I heard someone else say but did not thoroughly confirm for myself; I do not go spreading shaky allegations on the people you yourself have followed for their every post and every session, intending to turn people away from your own contributions on the matter.
I also never call anyone's arguments against mine a diatribe, not yours or anyone else's, because maybe everything that you had said is right, or everything you wanted to say to me is something I ought to take seriously.
Moreso than skepticism, respect is the critical tool in our digital war.
Point taken. Diatribe had a particularly insulting connotation I regret now. Apologies for the disrespect. I mean no harm.
You obviously care a great deal and have spent enough time researching GN. Any negativity or lazy judgement hits particularly close. Apologies for not having that awareness.
I can do better.
In my experience, all sources of information, from GN, To X22, to Redpill78, to anyone publishing information only has a piece of a puzzle that lies on top of a frosted pane of glass over an underwater bizarre game of chess.
Some people have pieces that go to a different puzzle. some have bigger pieces than others. GN may have bigger piece. I’ll let you judge.
In this very chat here, YOUTUBE TV LIVE (a member of the George Team) explains where their super chats go to:
Now, would a paytriot tell their audience, "Hey look, 30% of your superchats go to YouTube"? No, because then their audience would then think twice about giving such a large cut to YouTube, who has no business in generating the recipient's content, via the superchat system. Okay, then maybe they might want to send funds directly through a fundraising platform? That might be the case if only there were one for George News, but there are none! I have never heard of a paytriot that relies only on their merch and their superchats to receive their funds without some other fundraising platforms.
You dig up old allegations that don't hold much weight. The "pictures that other website", Alamy I assume, is one that is flawed. Those images are public domain images found on the WH45 Archive Flickr that George promised to upload on January 13, 2021 (Second compilation, timestamp 20:26) [2] and delivered on February 4, 2021 [7], well before anyone thought of them as paytriots. It could very well be that they owned the rights to those images directly, and before the archive was active they distributed those photos to SMG. Then the DVIDS video issue is more nuanced, but I believe George News bypasses DVIDS by way of direct involvement with the DoD. I can't prove it because I am not a party to that arrangement, and I won't be a fool to try as that one rogue mod did.
The comments on the Telegram do turn on during when the Chat Line is live to field questions or general opinion. The number of messages the receive during that time is enormous and number thousands in one hour. If left on for a longer duration that number could surpass millions, and there ain't no one who has the time or energy to sift through a million messages.
Well, maybe that's not what you're saying, that they shut it off to avoid having to answer questions about DVIDS and Alamy images during that time. Well, those are legal and licensing matters, and you can't answer those kinds of matters on a scale of hundreds or thousands simultaneously without being first prepared not to implicate yourself in a lawsuit prepared by some internet strangers. And you see, the ones who asked had a preconception bias that GN were the ones doing wrong, and that they were going to prove them guilty. "We're just asking a question," they claimed. No they weren't, they were no better than the journalists who asked Trump "simple questions" and either never wrote his answer or take his answer and cut up the bit that flattered him least.
There are plenty here on GA who either think highly of GN or take a "Let's watch, wait and see" approach, and give no weight to the allegations raised by that one rogue mod, and they are the ones who have asked me to continue these compilations in spite of the drama.
I just watched you list all of the reasons you have rationalized believing in GN. That is OK. What ever makes you, and supporters extremely happy and gives you hopium. Be my guest. I do feel advertising tshirts is a form of profit. I do feel with enough following, donations will be made regardless of what you say about you tube.
Now. Unless you have proof the donations go to veritas and T45, please allow me to remain skeptical. It would be far far far too easy for someone who did enough research and knew enough about Q to theoretically create a well meaning, but subtly sneaky, and cryptic following.
And that is why I say read at your own risk.
Now put the diatribe to go use and go redpill someone. I am your friend here. This is a place where skepticism is a criterial tool in our digital war. Manipulation is a tool in theirs.
Thank you for your concern. I do this in the full awareness that maybe, just maybe you are right and they really are masterful manipulators and profiteers.
I also understand that the number of calculations that must be made in order to maintain a "false GN" is astronomical. I am thus skeptical of the skepticism on that basis.
I also have more trust in my fellow patriots and am always willing to given them the benefit of a doubt. I also agree that there is also always something that I call "a donation economy", where people will buy merch and give donations just to contribute to a specific project like GN, but I look at it as GN making sure their audience is not preyed upon by imposters posing as them. I thus look also to the possibility that maybe, maybe you are wrong and the really are true, well-intentioned, legitimate patriots.
But look. I do not go around spreading words of caution that suggest the figures that you have supported are maybe, maybe paytriots, based on something I heard someone else say but did not thoroughly confirm for myself; I do not go spreading shaky allegations on the people you yourself have followed for their every post and every session, intending to turn people away from your own contributions on the matter.
I also never call anyone's arguments against mine a diatribe, not yours or anyone else's, because maybe everything that you had said is right, or everything you wanted to say to me is something I ought to take seriously.
Moreso than skepticism, respect is the critical tool in our digital war.
Point taken. Diatribe had a particularly insulting connotation I regret now. Apologies for the disrespect. I mean no harm.
You obviously care a great deal and have spent enough time researching GN. Any negativity or lazy judgement hits particularly close. Apologies for not having that awareness.
I can do better.
In my experience, all sources of information, from GN, To X22, to Redpill78, to anyone publishing information only has a piece of a puzzle that lies on top of a frosted pane of glass over an underwater bizarre game of chess.
Some people have pieces that go to a different puzzle. some have bigger pieces than others. GN may have bigger piece. I’ll let you judge.
Thank you for understanding, and I accept your apology.
Your analogy is beautiful.