I want to begin this post by first trying to clear up some misunderstandings from my previous posts that I could have articulated better.
1.) I want to first state that I did not start this series to say this is what will happen. There are a few paths being laid out that will lead to the same outcome. One of which is the military, but it is not the only way this can be resolved. However, based on Q saying this is the only way and the current events unfolding in front of us, this is looking like a plausible outcome.
2.) I do not have some secret inside information to the plan. What was discussed was the reality of what happens with military involvement (and what it would take to get them involved). If this person is privy to some plan, he would not share it with me. In other words, I was given a hard dose of reality to what it really means to say, 'The military is the only way."
What brought this discussion up was that the community has been so focused on tribunals and arrests when I was outright told this was probably the least likely outcome if military becomes involved.
Now on to the last post of this series.
In the first three posts, I was trying to outline what has been set up for what is before us today. I also wanted to mention that Q may have used the Digital Warriors to push some disinformation so the traitors to the US would move down a certain path - that of the steal of the 2020 Presidential Election. They wanted them terrified and they took the bait.
In the fourth post, regarding the States, this is one avenue still available that could save the Republic and do so in a peaceful manner. When mentioning the Compact and one side violating it, how will the States react and what actions will they take should the Federal Government be shown to be illegitimate?
Remember, this will encompass more than just the White House. It will implicate the executive branch - primarily the White House, the FBI and the DOJ (who blatantly lied to the American Public when they saw no evidence of fraud). It encompasses the Legislative Branch who took NO action in light of all the evidence of fraud that was on-going. It also encompasses the Judicial Branch who completely ignored any challenges to the election, even the SCOTUS who ignored the State challenges.
But it is much worse than this.
It also includes a media complex who assisted in it. It includes tech titans who blatantly took a side in this - from both the Covid narrative and political interests - and violated the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans while pushing the false narrative there was no fraud.
It also involves domestic terrorist organizations being able to operate not only with impunity, but with the literal support of government.
It involves certain state governors, attorney generals and secretaries of state involved.
Lastly, it most likely involves foreign powers working in unison with the above domestic actors.
Q wasn't kidding when he said: "All assets deployed [F][D]"
Think about how massive this syndicate is that was aligned against the American People during this last election. Consider what kind of coordination would be required to pull this off. Think about what it would take to get several states to literally suspend counting on election night. Think about how you could go about having upwards of 40M fraudulent ballots ready to go (and how you wouldn't have those manufactured in the US because it is too massive to potentially be discovered before the election).
I know these are things most of you know but it is important to recap for the remainder of this discussion. When you look at the above, it almost appears like a foreign enemy invaded our shores and pulled out all the stops to assault the US - does it not? Q has posted many times, "Infiltration instead of invasion." But what if you read that a bit differently as, "Invasion through infiltration."
Now we will get to the meat of the series.
The above is what we happened to be discussing when the following question was poised to me, "What to things could you add to that cocktail (meaning the list of everything above) that would result in 'They are totally screwed?' " Be aware that "totally screwed" is referring to the military getting involved.
My response was to cover the typical fraud being uncovered in several state audits, Durham appearing and dropping the hammer, etc.
Then I was basically told this. First, you would need a declared enemy of the US - like say some country that released a biological attack on US soil. Second, you would need to tie the election to this enemy which would make anyone involved in it an enemy of the US.
When this was said to me, I remembered reading this someone in the Q posts. Then I went back and found post 4524 and read the relevant lines:
Important people understand future events. All assets [F][D] deployed [D] + China = 11.3.
We talked about many things related to this for a bit which included me getting a very rational - and honestly reasonable - explanation for why the military would not get involved on an insurrection level. Basically, in a nutshell, I will leave it at this - there was no insurrection. An Insurrection is domestic actors trying to take control of the government. Domestic actors working on behalf of a foreign power is something completely different.
We discussed outcomes and involvement for a bit when the following chilling line was said to me, "Remember, in times of war traitors are not American citizens, they are enemy combatants."
Again, this is not a definitive response to what is to come. However, be aware that if this does end up and act of war against the US and these domestic actors rare then tied to the country involved in that act of war, what are the true ramifications?
The community has been so focused on arrests and tribunals it appears we may have overlooked what would happen if all of the above domestic entities mentioned above were suddenly deemed enemies of the US during a time of war?
Now I will lay out this scenario: If the Federal Government in DC is in place because of a declared enemy of the US and therefore becomes belligerent what exactly does it mean? If the entire Federal Government is basically working on behalf of a foreign power, what does it mean?
I was not definitely told that it means the Federal Government will be abolished (but it was pointed out to me how many times Q mentioned this exact outcome) but I was told to consider what would happen if the entire Federal Government was suddenly deemed an enemy of the US?
Again, this possibility never had crossed my mind before. This is about more than the government being illegitimate - this is about it suddenly becoming an actual enemy of the US working on behalf of a foreign power that we are suddenly at war with. The same goes for the MSM, tech titans and state actors that were involved. Let that sink in for a bit.
So of course, the possibility of an actual hot war with a major power had me concerned. After all, could this possibly lead to WWIII when Q said this was about avoiding that scenario. To which I was assured, what nation would ally with a nation that released a bio-weapon that destroyed 80% of the world's economy, and caused hundreds of millions to lose their jobs and hundreds of thousands to lose their businesses?
That is when I realized that what would happen if the bio-attack came to light is China would be isolated.
We then turned out attention to discussing the audits (at the time we had this discussion the Arizona Audit had been scheduled but not yet started). I mentioned how only three states proving the fraud would be enough to overturn the election. The response to me was two-fold. First, that would be if the intent was indeed to overturn the election. Second, if the intent is something else, than it will only take one audit with the proof needed a foreign enemy was involved.
Fast forward to today and we are seeing an extremely panicked response from the bad actors to the audit in AZ. Like they are unusually scared of what is going to be uncovered. Couple that with the recent events of the Covid-virus origin and suddenly this conversation came into full focus - along with the ramifications of what it could truly mean.
Remember when Q told us things would be biblical? Q once linked to a short clip for the movie Law-Abiding Citizen when Gerard Butler says that exact line. However, for those that watched the movie, in that scene the person sitting with him is discussing how the whole entire system is corrupt to which Gerard Butler responds that he is going to bring the whole, entire establishment down followed by the line, it is going to be biblical. Maybe the reference to that scene was on purpose.
Again, this is simply presented for the community thoughts and consideration. What I have attempted to describe through a series of posts of why this scenario could be plausible but, hopefully, will be resolved in other ways. I will say again, this is NOT a definitive of what is going to happen but more a synopsis of events that set this scenario as being something that could be a believable outcome.
I personally hope the States come together a prevail peacefully in this. However, the last election may have crossed a rubicon where things may become much more serious than we envisioned (at least that I have). This is not a definitive of what is going to happen, just a potential scenario.
The most important take away from all of this, however, is we are not sitting ducks swinging in the wind at this point. God bless the US. WWG1WGA.
A difference between the Federal Government and it's laws.
If the military took over the Federal Government temporarily, the Constitution and laws would still stand - just under the jurisdiction of the military.
Then the States will need to meet and decide what to do. Under the Law of War manual the US Military is to hold control until a legal government can be re-established. With the removal of the Federal Government, that decision would then fall to the States in a Constitutional Convention.
I believe they would clarify some language in the Constitution (such as the commerce clause the Feds used to exponentially expand their power), add actual voting processes in it (and the states that would oppose this do not have enough votes to stop it), set term limits, and set up a separate federal law enforcement NOT answerable to the Feds but to the States collectively, and make judges voted in, not appointed. There could be a few other things but the point being, the States would reform the Federal Government so that they were subservient to the States again.
While some of the above is conjecture on my part, it makes sense that we have seen how badly the Feds have twisted the intent of the Constitution to continually seize power. Give the States the opportunity to "tighten" the language in the Constitution and we could be in a much better position moving forward.