Do you have your [ ] filled in?
(media.greatawakening.win)
![Do you have your [ ] filled in?](https://media.greatawakening.win/post/hdWip5bd.jpeg){kind=link}
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
that was helpful - I am not complaining about that. What I am doing is trying to help you understand why I initially thought it was bogus, because OP originally provided as proof a link to the entire document dump with no info on page number, seemed like a classic forum-infiltration resource-depletion shill troll. Not sure if you’re going to understand it - i am surprised you don’t get it already - but I’m trying.
What I’m saying is that what I’ve supplied you with, the links, is it. That is it. What you’re wanting I’m gathering is something that I have no way of attaining, I don’t believe, without some credentials such as a journalist or lawyer could obtain. Now, this document cloud was compiled by the Leopold guy, I understand your hesitancy, I really do. However, I believe it’s been discovered that the initial FOIA request was done by Tom Fitton/Judicial Watch. The only other avenue I can think of to get the source source is through a FOIA request. I’m sorry that I can’t do anything more than give you the links I have, but that’s all I’ve got. I did go back and saw the specific page link for page 1408, did not have the page number with the specific document, I can understand your hesitancy on that and I apologize for that.
that’s all i was looking for originally and I now have it, so i am not sure why we are still talking about my original comment