The child always follows the allegiance of the father. http://www.usnaturalborncitizen.com/meaningofnaturalborn.html
Harris was born Oct. 20, 1964, and her father was a citizen of Jamaica at the time of her birth.
Specifically, Chapter 2 (entitled Citizenship) of the Jamaica Constitution, Section 3C states:
Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica –
-
on the sixth day of August 1962, in the case of a person born before that date; or
-
on the date of his/her birth, in the case of a person born on or after the sixth day of August 1962,
if, at that date, his/her father or mother is a citizen of Jamaica by birth, descent, or
registration by virtue of marriage to a citizen of Jamaica.
Wrong.
Anyone in the US is subject to the jurisdiction of the US. that’s basic law 101. Even tourists here are sibjec5 to the jurisdiction of US law. Everyone, even people on student visas.
If some tourist commits a crime, can they claim they are not subject to US law? Of course not, because universally, in every country on earth, people in a country are subject to the jurisdiction of that country.
So why include the clause at all? Because (and every country has some version of this) it excludes those few individuals who are NOT subject to the jurisdiction of the country they are in: Diplomats and posted serving military.
And that the way it works. Children of diplomats born in the US are NOT granted citizenship.
That’s what the ‘jurisdiction’ issue refers to. I’m a touch surprised you didn’t know this, as even 10 seconds on Google would show you the universal legal interpretation as I have said, and how it has been applied throughout history. Your claims are simply a deliberate attempt to ignore reality.
No, you didn’t.
You cited several regulations, and then wildly misinterpreted them.
I know exactly what jurisdiction of the law means. So does every law book ever written, which entirely agree with me. YOU do not.
Let’s start with a simple one: please support your claim that persons in the US on work visas are subject to the jurisdiction of their home country, and not the US. Because your provided link says nothing of the kind. Please provide snd evidence this claim is true, as without it you have nothing.