What about corroborating evidence that Hillary and Bill are responsible for the almost 100 random and horrific deaths of people around them or people about to testify against them?
Yes. I have seen substantial amounts of evidence that corroborates these stories as well. I don't have links to such information off the top of my head, but if I really cared I could find them. I suggest if you want to find any just do a search. There is a ton of good info.
What there is not good info or evidence for is the "german server raid." There is one person making a claim on a podcast. That's it. That is insufficient by any standard.
I would say the information that is out about alternative treatments to covid and the Clinton death count is as definitive as the information out about the servers. This is no longer a free speech or free information country. This is a banana republic too. You can find the information about the Germany raid if you dig deep enough. My point was that corroborating evidence doesn't even matter anymore, because no media outlet is honest or trustworthy even if that kind of information was allowed to be released during an ongoing war which we are in right now, but you won't see that on the news. We are all "conspiracy theorists" trying to make sense of pieces of data, stringing them together to formulate the best answer with the information we have.
If you really want to get an idea of the data about the electoral college votes yourself, look at the data right before all of the states shut down their tallying instead of the next morning when all of the states flipped. Then look at California and realize that state has been giving all of their votes to the blue side for so many years they just start the counting and then say the democrat won, they don't even try to count the votes. Then look at the data concerning all of the counties Trump won compared to any other president, the demographics he won compared to any other president, the map showing which areas voted blue and which voted red (which is staggering in and of itself), and also the massive following he has even in those supposedly blue states...
From there, you can do some funny math, and your totals should show you that he obviously won 410 electoral college votes at minimum... in all honesty, if it was a fair vote with only legal votes counted and every single one of them confirmed, I would say Biden didn't get any electoral college votes.
I would say the information that is out about alternative treatments to covid
I understand you may not appreciate it, but as a scientist in the field, I can say with certainty that not a single person, scientist or otherwise can discount the evidence I just provided for you.
That is what I call corroborating evidence. It doesn't have to be evidence everyone knows about. It just has to be evidence that a person can find if they look.
I have looked into evidence for the servers and have found none. It isn't that it is being hidden by the media, its that as far as I can tell, it doesn't exist.
You can find the information about the Germany raid if you dig deep enough
I've looked. I haven't found.
Show me just one thing. Point me in the direction of anything substantive.
What I have shown about ivermectin and HCQ is absolute proof of their efficacy and safety by any standard. Unless you can show me the same level of evidence for the servers even existing, much less their contents then it is not in the same category at all.
My point was that corroborating evidence doesn't even matter anymore
100% incorrect. It matters a great deal. I get information to other people all the time. Does it get to everyone? No. Does everyone who I get it to believe it? No. But if the evidence doesn't exist, then I can't even do that much. Corroborating evidence matters a great deal. In investigating the unknown and hidden which is our entire job, there is nothing more important.
If you really want to get an idea of the data about the electoral college votes yourself
I spent almost an entire month doing data analysis on hundreds, maybe thousands of data sets. I am well aware of what went on, or at least what the data says went on.
your totals should show you that he obviously won 410 electoral college votes at minimum
"at a minimum"
That's my point. This server data is almost certainly not accurate, even if true (which is HIGHLY questionable without corroborating evidence). Even you are saying it with this quote.
I am WELL AWARE that the election was stolen. I have proven it mathematically ten ways from Sunday after several hundred hours of work. And I agree with many of the other things you have said.
I am not in any way disputing election fraud, I am saying that corroborating evidence is required to put forth this story with any credibility.
To the best of my knowledge the contents of the server was a statement, by one person, on one podcast, one time. No serious investigator would suggest that is evidence of anything, except maybe a place to look deeper. Looking deeper I find nothing.
I agree with all that you said! And I like the way you laid it out! I normally do not get well thought out responses, I should have looked at your comment history first before making such a quick response.
"At about the same time on November 16th we heard from Rep. Louie Gohmert that people on the ground in Germany report that Scytl, which hosted elections data improperly through Spain, was raided by a large US ARMY force and their servers were seized in Frankfurt."
And on top of this corroborating evidence, the fact remains that Gina Haspel hasn’t been seen or heard from in public since the server raid. I think that’s pretty conclusive.
Any evidence other than a statement from Sidney Powell on a random podcast would be great.
Yes. There is an entire mountain of evidence for these.
Yes. I have seen substantial amounts of evidence that corroborates these stories as well. I don't have links to such information off the top of my head, but if I really cared I could find them. I suggest if you want to find any just do a search. There is a ton of good info.
What there is not good info or evidence for is the "german server raid." There is one person making a claim on a podcast. That's it. That is insufficient by any standard.
I would say the information that is out about alternative treatments to covid and the Clinton death count is as definitive as the information out about the servers. This is no longer a free speech or free information country. This is a banana republic too. You can find the information about the Germany raid if you dig deep enough. My point was that corroborating evidence doesn't even matter anymore, because no media outlet is honest or trustworthy even if that kind of information was allowed to be released during an ongoing war which we are in right now, but you won't see that on the news. We are all "conspiracy theorists" trying to make sense of pieces of data, stringing them together to formulate the best answer with the information we have.
If you really want to get an idea of the data about the electoral college votes yourself, look at the data right before all of the states shut down their tallying instead of the next morning when all of the states flipped. Then look at California and realize that state has been giving all of their votes to the blue side for so many years they just start the counting and then say the democrat won, they don't even try to count the votes. Then look at the data concerning all of the counties Trump won compared to any other president, the demographics he won compared to any other president, the map showing which areas voted blue and which voted red (which is staggering in and of itself), and also the massive following he has even in those supposedly blue states...
From there, you can do some funny math, and your totals should show you that he obviously won 410 electoral college votes at minimum... in all honesty, if it was a fair vote with only legal votes counted and every single one of them confirmed, I would say Biden didn't get any electoral college votes.
I understand you may not appreciate it, but as a scientist in the field, I can say with certainty that not a single person, scientist or otherwise can discount the evidence I just provided for you.
That is what I call corroborating evidence. It doesn't have to be evidence everyone knows about. It just has to be evidence that a person can find if they look.
I have looked into evidence for the servers and have found none. It isn't that it is being hidden by the media, its that as far as I can tell, it doesn't exist.
I've looked. I haven't found.
Show me just one thing. Point me in the direction of anything substantive.
What I have shown about ivermectin and HCQ is absolute proof of their efficacy and safety by any standard. Unless you can show me the same level of evidence for the servers even existing, much less their contents then it is not in the same category at all.
100% incorrect. It matters a great deal. I get information to other people all the time. Does it get to everyone? No. Does everyone who I get it to believe it? No. But if the evidence doesn't exist, then I can't even do that much. Corroborating evidence matters a great deal. In investigating the unknown and hidden which is our entire job, there is nothing more important.
I spent almost an entire month doing data analysis on hundreds, maybe thousands of data sets. I am well aware of what went on, or at least what the data says went on.
"at a minimum"
That's my point. This server data is almost certainly not accurate, even if true (which is HIGHLY questionable without corroborating evidence). Even you are saying it with this quote.
I am WELL AWARE that the election was stolen. I have proven it mathematically ten ways from Sunday after several hundred hours of work. And I agree with many of the other things you have said.
I am not in any way disputing election fraud, I am saying that corroborating evidence is required to put forth this story with any credibility.
To the best of my knowledge the contents of the server was a statement, by one person, on one podcast, one time. No serious investigator would suggest that is evidence of anything, except maybe a place to look deeper. Looking deeper I find nothing.
I agree with all that you said! And I like the way you laid it out! I normally do not get well thought out responses, I should have looked at your comment history first before making such a quick response.
But here is one page from the gateway pundit that talks about it, and Sydney only furthered the communication about it, she wasn't the only or the first one to speak of it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/12/going-server-reportedly-obtained-germany-related-2020-election/
"At about the same time on November 16th we heard from Rep. Louie Gohmert that people on the ground in Germany report that Scytl, which hosted elections data improperly through Spain, was raided by a large US ARMY force and their servers were seized in Frankfurt."
And on top of this corroborating evidence, the fact remains that Gina Haspel hasn’t been seen or heard from in public since the server raid. I think that’s pretty conclusive.
THIS! ☝️👏