Unless I'm mistaken, a military coup, unless lead directly by the People of the United States, would be a violation of the Constitution. I'm not saying it won't happen, just that there's no legal provision for it. From a strictly legal sense, I understand what she's saying.
You people are missing the point bigly. It's not a coup if the incumbents are illegitimate and were not legally or constitutionally elected ffs. THEY STOLE THE PRESIDENCY. This isn't hard to grasp.
It literally It just requires the military to do the one job it is given - remove hostile enemies when it's proved they stole power.
Aside from a military coup like in Myanmar ?
Unless I'm mistaken, a military coup, unless lead directly by the People of the United States, would be a violation of the Constitution. I'm not saying it won't happen, just that there's no legal provision for it. From a strictly legal sense, I understand what she's saying.
You people are missing the point bigly. It's not a coup if the incumbents are illegitimate and were not legally or constitutionally elected ffs. THEY STOLE THE PRESIDENCY. This isn't hard to grasp.
It literally It just requires the military to do the one job it is given - remove hostile enemies when it's proved they stole power.
It's restoring law and order.