"I mean, you can see a crucifix in the upper left corner of the painting... even if you don't know anything about history, you should notice those weird clothes the scientists are wearing..."
My response: This isn't about believing in Christ. You miss the point of the meme. If you didn't know at the time Religion was considered proven science by them, i know hard to look back at history you think scientists always wore lab coats. Point is they were the authority. My original argument in the meme has nothing to do with religion at all. The point is they had the authority at the time as "The trusted experts" anyone who disagreed was persecuted and silenced. Just as your media and big tech is doing to anyone who disagrees with what is "established" Can you not see my point? Or do you understand this meme's point of history repeating but don't want to admit that you're wrong on this one.
What he said:
"Nah, it's a "critique" of "the infaliability" of science, conveniently overlooking the fact that science is a recursive examination and elimination of possibilities, not a declaration of absolutism. The fact that science changes is proof that it works."
My response: exactly right on my argument at least you got that right, the part where you are wrong is suggesting that right now the "experts" could be just as wrong as the "experts" of Galileo's years I'm not anti science I'm anti dogma and the bastardization of science, science requires an open mind
Reply to BeeTLe_BeTHLeHeM on reddit
What he said:
"I mean, you can see a crucifix in the upper left corner of the painting... even if you don't know anything about history, you should notice those weird clothes the scientists are wearing..."
My response: This isn't about believing in Christ. You miss the point of the meme. If you didn't know at the time Religion was considered proven science by them, i know hard to look back at history you think scientists always wore lab coats. Point is they were the authority. My original argument in the meme has nothing to do with religion at all. The point is they had the authority at the time as "The trusted experts" anyone who disagreed was persecuted and silenced. Just as your media and big tech is doing to anyone who disagrees with what is "established" Can you not see my point? Or do you understand this meme's point of history repeating but don't want to admit that you're wrong on this one.
Reply to Farrell-Mars on reddit
What he said: " “Just trust the bible” was how it went; that is, if we are truthful instead of a lying POS."
My response: "Just trust Fauci and the experts" is how its going, same appeal to authority, both are wrong thats the point here. Where did I lie?
Reply to Commie_EntSniper (kek) on reddit
What he said: "Nah, it's a "critique" of "the infaliability" of science, conveniently overlooking the fact that science is a recursive examination and elimination of possibilities, not a declaration of absolutism. The fact that science changes is proof that it works."
My response: exactly right on my argument at least you got that right, the part where you are wrong is suggesting that right now the "experts" could be just as wrong as the "experts" of Galileo's years I'm not anti science I'm anti dogma and the bastardization of science, science requires an open mind
archived in case these fools change or delete their comments
https://web.archive.org/web/20210604170404/https://www.reddit.com/r/Qult_Headquarters/comments/ns5mss/these_people_are_so_dumb/