Have you seen ML's 9-0 video? Here's a link:
https://files.catbox.moe/plqsvh.mp4
He presents the data behind his claim of China's cyber hacks to change the election. He has his cyber expert there to answer questions.
Why should we take his word for it, though?
- ML vouches for the validity. But, so what? Who cares what he says?
- ML then asks the cyber expert to show the decrypted data packets and asks if they are valid. Expert says, "It's like having a video of the bank robbery" .
- Both guys explain how the data cannot be changed (or, if you would change it, it would be obvious).
- ML sets up the Supreme Court, saying they will vote 9-0 to change the election (not his exact words, but he says 9-0). This awesome, because we know SC won't even take the case. He is setting them up for all eyes to be on them.
- ML parardes a list of Democrats in 2017 decrying voting machines and how easy it is to hack them. This takes their hot air out of the equation. He even credits them for drawing attention to it.
- Cyber expert invites the cyber community to examine the data packets... and ultimately says the proof is irrefutable.
Still, so what? ML is a cook crack addict, yada, yada. Easy to dismiss, the deniers say. But, he has thrown down a gauntlet that must be acknowledged. The data is the essence of "We have it all" .
So I predict that millions will see this (keep sharing it), and when SC rejects taking the case, that will be the proof that we are so compromised that the military will need to act. Additionally, the forensic audits will return their own evidence--but I actually think that the ballot stuffing was a ddistraction from the cyber warfare.
What's the chance that military intelligence has also been provided the captured packets to investigate? What if military comes out and says they confirmed it?
Nothing short of spectacular. And, I'm guessing if "someone" gave it to Mike, then that "someone" has been doing the same analysis. What ML has done is make it accessible to millions of people who just like listening to a happy, energetic guy. When others come forward to confirm, they will have the credibility to convince the rest.
What if it is the military who gave copies of the packet data to Mike?
^^^This right here. Bingo^^^ 100% that ML is the conduit through which alot of the cyber evidence is being shown to the people.
I think his plan is also for people to become so outraged once they see this that the SC will have no choice but to take the case. The problem is that the media has labeled Mike a complete whacko so nobody will pay attention to him. We need some talking heads to start putting their weight behind it or else it’s going to fall flat.
Agreed. I have a feeling that that will happen, and that it has already been planned. I keep praying for such justice.
Exactly. I just think it’s not enough to watch it. There needs to be a strong response. Why can’t we put pressure on Rachel Maddow to take Mike up on his offer to review this evidence for example. There needs to be outrage from We The People.
Excellent idea. Maybe she reads this board : )
Hey Ratchit--care to duel with ML????
Actually, I think Tucker will take it on, soon. But, he needs to be able to have his team do its own analysis--he doesn't want to take ML's word for it. Maybe that's already happening.
Not sure how the chain of custody would be established legally either. How did he get this information and from whom? Was it authorized? Someone is going to have to lay a foundation at trial for where this information came from and why it is legitimately what Pillow guy is saying that it is. The fact that it was given to the Pillow guy first and foremost would seem like a big problem to me. Time will tell.
My thoughts exactly. Think mirror. This time the good guys are laying out a narrative for later use. It's brilliant.