I don't want you to believe me, I want you to do your own research by examining primary sources, which are not secret and are very widely available thanks to the internet.
Next, if you'll humor me, I want you to read through your post and enumerate the logical fallacies and practical inconsistencies in your argument. If you're an honest truth seeker, none of this should be an issue. That has really been my position this entire time—the emotional/illogical stance people automatically resort to when the issue of masonry arises. In my experience, most people are too lazy to do the research themselves, and instead love to parrot secondary interpretations ad infinitum.
In fact, I'll change my position if you could prove to me that our founding fathers were satanists (masonry and satanism don't mix by the way, but don't take my word for it).
If you want me to consider something, consider posting your sources. There is a lot of information out there. So link yours.
Next, if you're any sort of honest, you'll see that my logic is solid. Any system or group that is not subject to public scrutiny will become corrupt. That is as logically sound as it gets. We've seen that principle play out repeatedly throughout history.
I never said the founding fathers were satanists and claiming that I did is manipulative and disingenuous even for a shill like yourself.
The founding fathers were Christians and Deists mostly.
I do believe that Masons today are corrupt and it would not surprise me if they did worship satan. I also believe that due to the stratification of Masonry. Most low level Masons wouldn't haver a clue.
Consider that your dishonest arguments have only served to convince me that I am correct. Never trust a Mason.
I don't want you to believe me, I want you to do your own research by examining primary sources, which are not secret and are very widely available thanks to the internet.
Next, if you'll humor me, I want you to read through your post and enumerate the logical fallacies and practical inconsistencies in your argument. If you're an honest truth seeker, none of this should be an issue. That has really been my position this entire time—the emotional/illogical stance people automatically resort to when the issue of masonry arises. In my experience, most people are too lazy to do the research themselves, and instead love to parrot secondary interpretations ad infinitum.
In fact, I'll change my position if you could prove to me that our founding fathers were satanists (masonry and satanism don't mix by the way, but don't take my word for it).
If you want me to consider something, consider posting your sources. There is a lot of information out there. So link yours.
Next, if you're any sort of honest, you'll see that my logic is solid. Any system or group that is not subject to public scrutiny will become corrupt. That is as logically sound as it gets. We've seen that principle play out repeatedly throughout history.
I never said the founding fathers were satanists and claiming that I did is manipulative and disingenuous even for a shill like yourself.
The founding fathers were Christians and Deists mostly.
I do believe that Masons today are corrupt and it would not surprise me if they did worship satan. I also believe that due to the stratification of Masonry. Most low level Masons wouldn't haver a clue.
Consider that your dishonest arguments have only served to convince me that I am correct. Never trust a Mason.
Sweet deflection.
. . .
Also, what are the odds that you and u/CL7_ both reply to me within minutes on a dead thread from days ago?
. . .
Coincidence?