This is not ingredients in the vaccine. The HIV-Luc cell line is used in virus testing and creation. This does not make it part of the virus either. It's just the cell line they used in its development which is completely unsurprising. This cell line was designed for testing all sorts of things.
If you want to find something sinister where there is nothing sinister I can not stop you. I have explained why the HIV-Luc system is a commonly used system.
There is something else I forgot to mention above. The lipid called SM-102 has nothing to do with Luciferase specifically. The sheet you used in your graphic explains how it has been used to create a lipid nanoparticle to deliver mRNA for the reporter Luciferase. It can be used to create the same type of nanoparticle to deliver ANY mRNA, such as the mRNA that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, or a protein for a cancer specific surface protein (a common usage) or mRNA for any protein you want.
In the sheet you have it says "Luciferase" as an example because it is the most used reporter protein because when it catalyzes its reaction it gives off a photon in the visible spectrum. That's IT. Luciferase is not only not sinister, it is used all over the world in every bio lab everywhere because it is so damn useful, because it brings light (visible) and allows us to see, in real time, what is going on. If I used it as a reporter in my nanoparticle it tells me exactly which cells my nanoparticle made it into. That is useful for a million reasons.
Was it called "Luciferase" (bringer of light) 120+ years ago by the discoverer in tribute to Satan? Maybe, maybe not. I have no idea. But if that is true, that is not something that most of the hundreds of thousands (probably) of people that use it regularly have any clue about (myself included until recently) Its just an amazingly useful tool in the cell bio toolkit.
Can the HIV part of this infect people?
This is not ingredients in the vaccine. The HIV-Luc cell line is used in virus testing and creation. This does not make it part of the virus either. It's just the cell line they used in its development which is completely unsurprising. This cell line was designed for testing all sorts of things.
Again, totally common cell bio stuff.
Totally normal HIV plasmids being used.
If you want to find something sinister where there is nothing sinister I can not stop you. I have explained why the HIV-Luc system is a commonly used system.
There is something else I forgot to mention above. The lipid called SM-102 has nothing to do with Luciferase specifically. The sheet you used in your graphic explains how it has been used to create a lipid nanoparticle to deliver mRNA for the reporter Luciferase. It can be used to create the same type of nanoparticle to deliver ANY mRNA, such as the mRNA that encodes the SARS-CoV-2 S protein, or a protein for a cancer specific surface protein (a common usage) or mRNA for any protein you want.
In the sheet you have it says "Luciferase" as an example because it is the most used reporter protein because when it catalyzes its reaction it gives off a photon in the visible spectrum. That's IT. Luciferase is not only not sinister, it is used all over the world in every bio lab everywhere because it is so damn useful, because it brings light (visible) and allows us to see, in real time, what is going on. If I used it as a reporter in my nanoparticle it tells me exactly which cells my nanoparticle made it into. That is useful for a million reasons.
Was it called "Luciferase" (bringer of light) 120+ years ago by the discoverer in tribute to Satan? Maybe, maybe not. I have no idea. But if that is true, that is not something that most of the hundreds of thousands (probably) of people that use it regularly have any clue about (myself included until recently) Its just an amazingly useful tool in the cell bio toolkit.
Why would lentivirus HIV protein be used? I mean the sinister nature of it is in its name, HIV.
It also states the SM-102 is not for human use.