Yes, you do. The Roman Catholic Church was burning people at the stake for daring to translate the Bible into their native languages.
God forbid somebody believed a piece of bread was not the literal body of Christ. The Catholics would torture people into reneging on their claims and would then slit their throats so they couldn't recant. They viewed this as saving their eternal souls.
The Catholics even went as far as to dig up the corpses of Reformers such as Tyndall just so they could burn their remains.
I find it very doubtful you've read Foxe's Book of Martyrs or have even heard of it. If you had, you'd know the truth.
Also, the Roman Catholic Church was involved in the murder of multiple infants born to nuns. Archaeologists have recovered the remains in underground tunnels connecting nunneries with seminaries.
The Knights Templar went underground after Jacques de Molay and others were executed for their crimes of sodomy and raping children. Those Templars were arrested in a dawn raid on October, Friday 13 in the year 1307 (this is where the superstitions around Friday 13 started).
Ignatius Loyola was part of the Alumbrados AKA the Illuminated Ones AKA the Illiuminati. He was the founder of the Jesuits.
After the Jesuits infiltrated Freemasonry (which happened after the Roman Catholic Church banned the order for similar crimes against children and sodomy), they used Napoleon to capture the Pope and restore their order.
Once Napoleon had served his purpose (the Jesuit Order was reinstated as condition of the Pope being released), he lost at the Battle of Waterloo. I'm sure it's just a coincidence the Bankers of the Vatican AKA the Rothschilds imploded the British economy due to their advanced knowledge of what was going to take place at Waterloo.
The Jesuits, while they were banned, established Georgetown University. The land where Washington, D.C. stands today was donated by Jesuit priest John Carroll and his brother Charles, the only Catholic to have signed both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The lands used to be part of Virginia and Maryland. It's the District of Columbia because Columbia was the goddess the Catholics chose the Virgin Mary to represent.
After the Freemasons were infiltrated by the Jesuits, they established the Order of DeMolay as a youth organization. Bill Clinton was a member.
You know Washington's parents hired a Jesuit tudor for him right? And he died a Catholic.
Uh oh!
Freemasonry infiltrated by a Jesuit? Perhaps, but he was a crypto-Jew pushing Enlightenment wearing the cloak of Jesuitism. Adam Weishaupt does not represent the Jesuits. The Jesuits are an anti-communist order - https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p1_1.xml?language=en
Weishaupt was like Rachel Dolezal, pretending to be something he isn't in an effort to obfuscate the truth. Maybe one of the first republicans in name only.
Napoleon had such a positive relationship with the Jews that the Russian Orthodox Church declared him the "Anti-Christ" and "Enemy of God."
He wasn't working for the Catholic church. He was working for the infiltration, the cryptos. The same hidden hand that exists today.
Maybe you should check out E Michael Jones' "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit".
Anyway, where were we?
The Illuminati, which historically refers to the Bavarian Illuminati, was founded by Adam Weishaupt, an 18 th century German university professor. Weishaupt was born in Ingolstadt, in the Electorate of Bavaria in 1748. His father was a law professor and passed away when his son was only five years old. Weishaupt was then raised by his grandfather, who was also a law professor as well as a proponent of the Enlightenment. At the age of seven, Weishaupt began attending a Jesuit school as his family was Catholic.
RAISED BY A PROPONENT OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT...HMMMMMMMMM.
Doesn't sound very Jesuit-y to me.
In fact, if you wanted to see how much the Catholic church opposes the Enlightenment, take the time to learn what the church says about this diabolical philosophy:
There is nothing more anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit than Enlightenment philosophy.
YOU have it backwards. You are pushing NWO Freemasonic history propaganda. Q specifically called out the Freemasons. Trump stuffed his staff with Catholics.
It's true what you said about George Washington. Consider the fact he was tutored by the Jesuits while their order was banned. He pretended to be a Protestant and became a Freemason. Washington was also buried as a Catholic while wearing his Freemasonic apron. You're not exactly proving your point here.
I notice you didn't even touch the rest of what I posted about Loyola, the Carrolls, the Rothschilds being the Vatican bankers, the goddess Columbia equating to the Virgin Mary, etc.
As far as Weishaupt goes, prove he was a Jesuit in name only. He left the Jesuit order only because it was banned. The Freemasons were behind the French Revolution (revenge against the French monarchy for their expulsion of both the Knights Templar and the Jesuit order) and behind the capture of the Pope (which prompted the Pope to reverse the ban of the Jesuit order).
Why are all these Jesuit educated people becoming key figures in the Enlightenment anyways? It couldn't be that the Jesuits play on both sides (after all, disguising their true intentions is part of their oath) and use the Hegelain Dialectic to accomplish their goals, could it?
Now explain why the Treaty of Verona was a secret.
P.S. I'd love to see you explain why Obama had so many Georgetown graduates in his cabinet and writing his speeches, or the fact Obama's mentor was Jesuit priest and community organizer Gregory Galluzo.
The saints can't hear your prayers. They're dead and will not awake until Christ returns.
Placing a crown of roses on a statue of Mary is idolatry. I don't care if the Catholics use the term veneration to hide that.
Read your Bible and remember the words of Yashua-
Mark 7:7-9
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Compare that statement to the Roman Catholic Catechism.
Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, then, are bound closely together, and communicate one with the other. For both of them, flowing out from the same divine well-spring, come together in some fashion to form one thing, and move towards the same goal.
As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, "does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence.
The coverup of pedophilia, the Vatican building that looks like a snake, Pope Benedict drooling over homosexual gymnasts without their shirts on, and the list goes on and on. Those aren't the fruits that scream the Gospel of Truth to me.
The Roman Catholic Church was burning people at the stake for daring to translate the Bible into their native languages.
Nope.
False information. Nobody was burned in the Middle Ages for translating the Bible into the vernacular. Absolutely nobody. This is just anti-Catholic propaganda invented after Luther, in order to justify the great revolt against the Church which divided Christendom, and discarded much of the heritage of the previous 15 centuries of Christian practice.
It is certainly true that people were burned in the Middle Ages, but it was because they were found guilty of heresy, not because they produced translations of the Bible. Heresy was a serious crime against the State, subversive of the whole order of society. So if the Church court found you guilty of heresy, despite being given several opportunities to recant your errors, it then handed you over to the State authorities. The King or Parliament had decreed the death penalty for heresy, and the sheriffs and magistrates executed it.
Another writer has mentioned Jan Hus, who certainly was badly treated at the Council of Konstanz in 1415. But it wasn’t for translation.
John Wycliffe died in good standing as Vicar of Lutterworth in Leicestershire, but his edition of the English Bible had a Prologue very critical of the Church. This version was banned by the bishops at Oxford in 1408. It had become associated with Lollardy and the Peasants’ Revolt of 1481, which threatened the Crown and murdered the Archbishop of Canterbury. So the Establishment rather vindictively had Wycliffe’s body dug up and burnt, before throwing his ashes into the river. Many people continued using Wycliffe’s translation without realizing its provenance.
By the 1400’s there were editions of the Bible in Italian, French, Castilian Spanish, Catalan, Czech, German, Slavonic, Arabic. None of their translators were burnt! And of course neither was St Jerome, when c.380 he translated the Biblical Greek and Hebrew into the Vulgar Latin vernacular of the western Empire.
I find it very doubtful you've read Foxe's Book of Martyrs or have even heard of it. If you had, you'd know the truth.
Book of Martyrs, FOXE’S.—John Foxe was born at Boston in Lincolnshire, England, in 1516, and was educated at Magdalen School and College, Oxford. He joined the more extreme Reformers early in life and under Edward VI acted as tutor to the children of the recently beheaded Earl of Surrey. In Mary’s reign he fled to Germany and joined the exiles at Frankfort. In the controversy which arose there he took sides with Knox and the extremists and after the break up of the Frankfort colony he went to Basle where poverty compelled him to take service with the Protestant printer Oporinus. In 1559 he returned to England and entered the ministry; he was helped by his old pupil the Duke of Norfolk and was mainly occupied with his martyrology. He still belonged to the extremists and objected to the surplice. His opinions interfered with his prospects, but he was not an ambitious man. Though violent and dishonest in controversy, he was personally of a kind and charitable temper. Besides his “Acts and Monuments” he published a number of sermons, translations, and controversial attacks on Catholicism. He died in 1587.
Even before leaving England in 1554 Foxe had begun the story of the persecutions of the Reformers. The result was the publication of a little Latin work dealing mainly with Wyclifism. While at Basle he was supplied by Grindal with reports of the persecution in England and in 1559 he published a large Latin folio of 740 pages which began with Wyclif and ended with Cranmer. After his return to England he began to translate this book and to add to it the results of fresh information. The “Acts and Monuments” were finally published in 1563 but came almost immediately to be known as the “Book of Martyrs”. The criticism which the work called forth led to the publication of a “corrected” edition in 1570. Two more (1576 and 1583) came out during his life and five (1596, 1610, 1632, 1641, 1684) within the next hundred years. There have been two modern editions, both unsatisfactory; they are in eight volumes and were published in 1837-41 and 1877. The size of the work may be gathered from the fact that in the edition of 1684 it consists of three folio volumes of 895, 682, and 863 pages respectively. Each page has two columns and over eighty lines. The first volume besides introductory matter contains the story of early Christian persecutions, a sketch of medieval church history and an account of the Wyclifite movement in England and on the continent. The second volume deals with the reigns of Henry VIII and Edward VI and the third with that of Mary. A large number of official documents such as injunctions, articles of accusation, letters, etc., have been included. The book is illustrated throughout by woodcuts, some of them symbolizing the triumph of the Reformation, most of them depicting the sufferings of the martyrs.
The convocation of the English Church ordered in 1571 that copies of the “Book of Martyrs” should be kept for public inspection in all cathedrals and in the houses of church dignitaries. The book was also exposed in many parish churches. The passionate intensity of the style, the vivid and picturesque dialogues made it very popular among Puritan and Low Church families down to the nineteenth century. Even the fantastically partisan church history of the earlier portion of the book, with its grotesque stories of popes and monks and its motley succession of witnesses to the truth (including the Albigenses, Grosseteste, Dante, and Savonarola) was accepted amongst simple folk and must have contributed much to anti-Catholic prejudices in England. When Foxe treats of his own times his work is of greater value as it contains many documents and is largely based on the reports of eyewitnesses; but he sometimes dishonestly mutilates his documents and is quite untrustworthy in his treatment of evidence. He was criticized in his own day by Catholics such as Harpsfield and Father Parsons and by practically all serious ecclesiastical historians.
Yes, you do. The Roman Catholic Church was burning people at the stake for daring to translate the Bible into their native languages.
God forbid somebody believed a piece of bread was not the literal body of Christ. The Catholics would torture people into reneging on their claims and would then slit their throats so they couldn't recant. They viewed this as saving their eternal souls.
The Catholics even went as far as to dig up the corpses of Reformers such as Tyndall just so they could burn their remains.
I find it very doubtful you've read Foxe's Book of Martyrs or have even heard of it. If you had, you'd know the truth.
Also, the Roman Catholic Church was involved in the murder of multiple infants born to nuns. Archaeologists have recovered the remains in underground tunnels connecting nunneries with seminaries.
The Knights Templar went underground after Jacques de Molay and others were executed for their crimes of sodomy and raping children. Those Templars were arrested in a dawn raid on October, Friday 13 in the year 1307 (this is where the superstitions around Friday 13 started).
Ignatius Loyola was part of the Alumbrados AKA the Illuminated Ones AKA the Illiuminati. He was the founder of the Jesuits.
After the Jesuits infiltrated Freemasonry (which happened after the Roman Catholic Church banned the order for similar crimes against children and sodomy), they used Napoleon to capture the Pope and restore their order.
Once Napoleon had served his purpose (the Jesuit Order was reinstated as condition of the Pope being released), he lost at the Battle of Waterloo. I'm sure it's just a coincidence the Bankers of the Vatican AKA the Rothschilds imploded the British economy due to their advanced knowledge of what was going to take place at Waterloo.
The Jesuits, while they were banned, established Georgetown University. The land where Washington, D.C. stands today was donated by Jesuit priest John Carroll and his brother Charles, the only Catholic to have signed both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The lands used to be part of Virginia and Maryland. It's the District of Columbia because Columbia was the goddess the Catholics chose the Virgin Mary to represent.
After the Freemasons were infiltrated by the Jesuits, they established the Order of DeMolay as a youth organization. Bill Clinton was a member.
I could keep going but I'm done ranting for now.
I know you're going to prove that and while I wait for your proof, here is some food for thought:
The Freemasons were infiltrated by the Illuminati, not the Jesuits - https://thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/23/george-washington-on-the-illuminatis-infiltration-of-european-freemasonry/
You know Washington's parents hired a Jesuit tudor for him right? And he died a Catholic.
Uh oh!
Freemasonry infiltrated by a Jesuit? Perhaps, but he was a crypto-Jew pushing Enlightenment wearing the cloak of Jesuitism. Adam Weishaupt does not represent the Jesuits. The Jesuits are an anti-communist order - https://brill.com/view/journals/jjs/5/1/article-p1_1.xml?language=en
Weishaupt was like Rachel Dolezal, pretending to be something he isn't in an effort to obfuscate the truth. Maybe one of the first republicans in name only.
Gee. How sneaky. How...predictable. They don't call 'em "cryptos" for nothing - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfSFKxzY2V8
Speaking of cryptos...
Napoleon had such a positive relationship with the Jews that the Russian Orthodox Church declared him the "Anti-Christ" and "Enemy of God."
He wasn't working for the Catholic church. He was working for the infiltration, the cryptos. The same hidden hand that exists today.
Maybe you should check out E Michael Jones' "The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit".
Anyway, where were we?
The Illuminati, which historically refers to the Bavarian Illuminati, was founded by Adam Weishaupt, an 18 th century German university professor. Weishaupt was born in Ingolstadt, in the Electorate of Bavaria in 1748. His father was a law professor and passed away when his son was only five years old. Weishaupt was then raised by his grandfather, who was also a law professor as well as a proponent of the Enlightenment. At the age of seven, Weishaupt began attending a Jesuit school as his family was Catholic.
RAISED BY A PROPONENT OF THE ENLIGHTENMENT...HMMMMMMMMM.
Doesn't sound very Jesuit-y to me.
In fact, if you wanted to see how much the Catholic church opposes the Enlightenment, take the time to learn what the church says about this diabolical philosophy:
https://www.catholic.com/search?q=enlightenment
https://www.youtube.com/c/SensusFidelium/search?query=enlightenment
There is nothing more anti-Catholic and anti-Jesuit than Enlightenment philosophy.
YOU have it backwards. You are pushing NWO Freemasonic history propaganda. Q specifically called out the Freemasons. Trump stuffed his staff with Catholics.
I think you entered the wrong saloon, boy.
DeMolay International proudly proclaims Bill Clinton's association on their website. It's pretty easy to prove that-
https://demolay.org/project/william-j-clinton/
It's true what you said about George Washington. Consider the fact he was tutored by the Jesuits while their order was banned. He pretended to be a Protestant and became a Freemason. Washington was also buried as a Catholic while wearing his Freemasonic apron. You're not exactly proving your point here.
I notice you didn't even touch the rest of what I posted about Loyola, the Carrolls, the Rothschilds being the Vatican bankers, the goddess Columbia equating to the Virgin Mary, etc.
As far as Weishaupt goes, prove he was a Jesuit in name only. He left the Jesuit order only because it was banned. The Freemasons were behind the French Revolution (revenge against the French monarchy for their expulsion of both the Knights Templar and the Jesuit order) and behind the capture of the Pope (which prompted the Pope to reverse the ban of the Jesuit order).
Why are all these Jesuit educated people becoming key figures in the Enlightenment anyways? It couldn't be that the Jesuits play on both sides (after all, disguising their true intentions is part of their oath) and use the Hegelain Dialectic to accomplish their goals, could it?
Now explain why the Treaty of Verona was a secret.
P.S. I'd love to see you explain why Obama had so many Georgetown graduates in his cabinet and writing his speeches, or the fact Obama's mentor was Jesuit priest and community organizer Gregory Galluzo.
I didn't ask you to prove that. Now you're arguing points no one ever brought up.
Pushing enlightenment philosophy pretty much sums that up.
You keep glossing over the fact that the Jesuits were infiltrated. That explains what you are seeing.
ahahahahaha
The saints can't hear your prayers. They're dead and will not awake until Christ returns.
Placing a crown of roses on a statue of Mary is idolatry. I don't care if the Catholics use the term veneration to hide that.
Read your Bible and remember the words of Yashua-
Mark 7:7-9
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
Compare that statement to the Roman Catholic Catechism.
Sacred Tradition and Sacred Scripture, then, are bound closely together, and communicate one with the other. For both of them, flowing out from the same divine well-spring, come together in some fashion to form one thing, and move towards the same goal.
As a result the Church, to whom the transmission and interpretation of Revelation is entrusted, "does not derive her certainty about all revealed truths from the holy Scriptures alone. Both Scripture and Tradition must be accepted and honoured with equal sentiments of devotion and reverence.
https://archive.is/m6er
Yashua also said this-
Matthew 7:20
Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.
The coverup of pedophilia, the Vatican building that looks like a snake, Pope Benedict drooling over homosexual gymnasts without their shirts on, and the list goes on and on. Those aren't the fruits that scream the Gospel of Truth to me.
Nope.
False information. Nobody was burned in the Middle Ages for translating the Bible into the vernacular. Absolutely nobody. This is just anti-Catholic propaganda invented after Luther, in order to justify the great revolt against the Church which divided Christendom, and discarded much of the heritage of the previous 15 centuries of Christian practice.
It is certainly true that people were burned in the Middle Ages, but it was because they were found guilty of heresy, not because they produced translations of the Bible. Heresy was a serious crime against the State, subversive of the whole order of society. So if the Church court found you guilty of heresy, despite being given several opportunities to recant your errors, it then handed you over to the State authorities. The King or Parliament had decreed the death penalty for heresy, and the sheriffs and magistrates executed it.
Another writer has mentioned Jan Hus, who certainly was badly treated at the Council of Konstanz in 1415. But it wasn’t for translation.
John Wycliffe died in good standing as Vicar of Lutterworth in Leicestershire, but his edition of the English Bible had a Prologue very critical of the Church. This version was banned by the bishops at Oxford in 1408. It had become associated with Lollardy and the Peasants’ Revolt of 1481, which threatened the Crown and murdered the Archbishop of Canterbury. So the Establishment rather vindictively had Wycliffe’s body dug up and burnt, before throwing his ashes into the river. Many people continued using Wycliffe’s translation without realizing its provenance.
By the 1400’s there were editions of the Bible in Italian, French, Castilian Spanish, Catalan, Czech, German, Slavonic, Arabic. None of their translators were burnt! And of course neither was St Jerome, when c.380 he translated the Biblical Greek and Hebrew into the Vulgar Latin vernacular of the western Empire.
Book of Martyrs, FOXE’S.—John Foxe was born at Boston in Lincolnshire, England, in 1516, and was educated at Magdalen School and College, Oxford. He joined the more extreme Reformers early in life and under Edward VI acted as tutor to the children of the recently beheaded Earl of Surrey. In Mary’s reign he fled to Germany and joined the exiles at Frankfort. In the controversy which arose there he took sides with Knox and the extremists and after the break up of the Frankfort colony he went to Basle where poverty compelled him to take service with the Protestant printer Oporinus. In 1559 he returned to England and entered the ministry; he was helped by his old pupil the Duke of Norfolk and was mainly occupied with his martyrology. He still belonged to the extremists and objected to the surplice. His opinions interfered with his prospects, but he was not an ambitious man. Though violent and dishonest in controversy, he was personally of a kind and charitable temper. Besides his “Acts and Monuments” he published a number of sermons, translations, and controversial attacks on Catholicism. He died in 1587.
Even before leaving England in 1554 Foxe had begun the story of the persecutions of the Reformers. The result was the publication of a little Latin work dealing mainly with Wyclifism. While at Basle he was supplied by Grindal with reports of the persecution in England and in 1559 he published a large Latin folio of 740 pages which began with Wyclif and ended with Cranmer. After his return to England he began to translate this book and to add to it the results of fresh information. The “Acts and Monuments” were finally published in 1563 but came almost immediately to be known as the “Book of Martyrs”. The criticism which the work called forth led to the publication of a “corrected” edition in 1570. Two more (1576 and 1583) came out during his life and five (1596, 1610, 1632, 1641, 1684) within the next hundred years. There have been two modern editions, both unsatisfactory; they are in eight volumes and were published in 1837-41 and 1877. The size of the work may be gathered from the fact that in the edition of 1684 it consists of three folio volumes of 895, 682, and 863 pages respectively. Each page has two columns and over eighty lines. The first volume besides introductory matter contains the story of early Christian persecutions, a sketch of medieval church history and an account of the Wyclifite movement in England and on the continent. The second volume deals with the reigns of Henry VIII and Edward VI and the third with that of Mary. A large number of official documents such as injunctions, articles of accusation, letters, etc., have been included. The book is illustrated throughout by woodcuts, some of them symbolizing the triumph of the Reformation, most of them depicting the sufferings of the martyrs.
The convocation of the English Church ordered in 1571 that copies of the “Book of Martyrs” should be kept for public inspection in all cathedrals and in the houses of church dignitaries. The book was also exposed in many parish churches. The passionate intensity of the style, the vivid and picturesque dialogues made it very popular among Puritan and Low Church families down to the nineteenth century. Even the fantastically partisan church history of the earlier portion of the book, with its grotesque stories of popes and monks and its motley succession of witnesses to the truth (including the Albigenses, Grosseteste, Dante, and Savonarola) was accepted amongst simple folk and must have contributed much to anti-Catholic prejudices in England. When Foxe treats of his own times his work is of greater value as it contains many documents and is largely based on the reports of eyewitnesses; but he sometimes dishonestly mutilates his documents and is quite untrustworthy in his treatment of evidence. He was criticized in his own day by Catholics such as Harpsfield and Father Parsons and by practically all serious ecclesiastical historians.
Prove it.
A MASONIC BLUEPRINT FOR THE SUBVERSION OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH - https://fatima.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/BT057-Alta-Vendita-2019-WEB2.pdf