I assume that you read the thread, right? It sure would be nice if you gave a summary, or highlighted the main points of the thread.
Yup, I am lazy, but it would also force you to actually remember what you read, and be able to articulate it. But it would also help that if we read the thread, to see if our comprehension of what the information means, compares with yours.
I realize that, and apologize. I just honestly suck at it, always have, but I will try.
I always knew there was a reason for them presenting the cases in the manner they did and knew they expected the outcome they rec'd, so to me, he explained all the whys in a very thorough easy to see and understand way.
I assume that you read the thread, right? It sure would be nice if you gave a summary, or highlighted the main points of the thread.
Yup, I am lazy, but it would also force you to actually remember what you read, and be able to articulate it. But it would also help that if we read the thread, to see if our comprehension of what the information means, compares with yours.
I realize that, and apologize. I just honestly suck at it, always have, but I will try.
I always knew there was a reason for them presenting the cases in the manner they did and knew they expected the outcome they rec'd, so to me, he explained all the whys in a very thorough easy to see and understand way.