Sitting around watching the puppies play allows time for reflection on various hypothetical scenarios.
Here is one:
Assume your country is engaged in a war where the enemy plans to use fear and bio-weapons (like a virus) to shut down your country for two plus years until a “vaccine” is formally approved for use on ALL citizens to be followed by a “vaccine passport.”
Would it be a brilliant tactical move to rush to the public a non-mandatory vaccine for adults on an emergency basis to prevent the collapse of the country from fear and an economic meltdown with all attendant consequences?
Which scenario would minimize casualties of the war?
Asking for a friend.
I don't think so.. if only because the vaccine skeptics are generally not afraid of covid. So them avoiding the vaccine is not furthering the scam. Maybe some vaccinated people are worried about unvaccinated people but I think that is a small group of hard core idiots.
Everybody who wants one has it.
And it appears to be fairly dangerous immediately, at least when compared with risk of covid with early treatment amidst a declining case rate... and who knows about longer term.
Personally I think trump screwed the pooch on this one if indeed it's a 2 part bioweapon. Lots of salt of the earth types and generally responsible people took the shot.
Sometimes you pick the better of two horrible choices.
Is this the better choice? Allowing early treatments to be suppressed to allow part 1 of a 2 part bioweapon to be deployed on some of the best parts of your domestic population?
Whereas Ivermectin would have just stopped it in its tracks as we now have proof of from India and elsewhere.. but this was known for months.
Besides that, Ivermectin "the wonder drug" neutralizes the spike protein. It is common as dirt, and only costs about $2 for several doses (which is all you need).
I think that is what will save all of the gullible idiots that blindly did what they were told to do by the DS. That is also why it does no harm if President Trump endorses the fake vaccines (helps get the country back to normal faster).
I'm not sure I understand how Ivermectin works (though, it clearly does work). If there is a problem with the vaccine, I'm not sure there is reason to think Ivermectin helps.
The vaccine does produce spikes in the bloodstream (See this paper for an analysis of free floating spikes post vaccination: https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075 ) But this seems to happen only briefly and not in huge concentrations. The spikes do cause damage and kill some people, but this only the immediate effect.
My other concern about the vaccine is that it produces antibodies specific to the spike, that are unique to vaccinated people. A second virus could be designed to exploit those antibodies (via antibody dependent enhancement) and kill only vaccinated people. Funny how China does not allow these vaccines, but provided the vaccine makers with the spike coding and suggested how to use it to make a vaccine.
I don't think there is reason to think that the treatments for COVID would necessarily work against this other virus; it could be a completely different virus that includes a feature that binds to a vaccination induced antibody, and uses that as a way to exploit the immune response.
Hopefully this is not possible for some reason, but it sounds possible to me.
Ivermectin binds to the spike protein, so after that the spike protein cannot bind to ACE2 receptors... it therefore neutralizes both the virus and the injections that contain just the spike protein - or use mRNA to cause people's cells to produce the spike protein.
No matter which way they occur, Ivermectin binds to the spike proteins... period. That is what will save people.
They need to be turned prior to boosters. Just ramblin...