Q: 4953 - We're not going to take it...
Q-incidence!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
There is no reason to think the Bible escaped the Luciferian's influence, especially in the Old Testament.
This is exactly the type of teachings you get from the Luciferians. This is a very Ba'al move. There is no creator God that cares about the people of the world that actively goes around killing them with poisonous snakes, for any reason.
Or take the Passover (the original). What creator God, who imbues mankind with free will and the ability to learn from their mistakes goes around killing first born children in a blood sacrifice?
What other god does that exact same thing? Oh, that's right, Ba'al. He's famous for it.
"But it was because the Pharaoh wouldn't let the Israelites go!". So a creator God had to choose the lesser evil? (Oh ya, and he's also an actual racist (Israelites >> Egyptians.))
No creator God EVER has to choose the lesser evil.
I am not suggesting the Bible was written by Luciferians. I am not suggesting the teachings of Jesus are suspect. I am suggesting that it is unlikely that the Bible, whose content was ultimately decided upon by a self proclaimed worshiper of the Sun God (Mithra) 300 years after the death of Jesus, somehow escaped that influence.
"But the bible says it is complete."
How do you keep people from using critical thinking skills? You include within their "book of absolute truth" the tenant that believing (or even looking at) anything external to that book is sacrilegious.
"Conspiracy Theorist" is the new "Heretic."
interesting post, and I wonder about this a lot too...how we can trust various versions of the Bible knowing the cabal is Everywhere. guess that's why I'm so convinced the Q Source/Sayings Gospel of Jesus is the way to go. it's like the Holy Spirit left a code between Matthew and Luke in the Bible. So amazing to think about, that the verses in the Q Source coincide so well with our Q...
http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/q.html
Even the gospel is possibly compromised in a couple of the details. I've seen a couple places that are sus. However, the deeper message, the teachings are very likely largely untouched. Such opportunism fits their MO.
In their division tactics they create one side that is mostly false, to oppose the one side that is mostly true. They tweak the false with just enough truth and reasonable philosophy to keep the believers believing. They take what's true and tweak it just enough to keep the people that side with the true unwilling to look at the ones creating the division, causing them to stay focused on the "false side" as the only enemy.
They maybe also throw one or two falsehoods in to dull some of the finer points, or create justification of doubt so that the false side stays on the false side.
Its insidious but you can see such tactics throughout history. It is obvious in our Dem. v. Rep. battle, but its everywhere once you realize it. I see it in every religion v. religion, or every parliament, every social ethics struggle, economic struggle, every single place you can see such tactics. Its almost the definition of what it means to be socially divided.
Its pretty fascinating.