People won't end up just fighting for misguided friends.

Mothers. Fathers. Brothers, sisters. Daughters, sons, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces, nephews.

When I say that if my family dies from taking the vaccines, there won't be any "I told you so", there will be retribution, and it isn't a threat or just frustrated words, it is a promise.

Highjacking top comment.

Magnetofection uses a different type of lipid nanoparticle than the listed ingredients in the vaccines. Could they be sticking one inside the other? Maybe. I don't think its impossible, though I'm not sure why they would. Without an external directed magnetic field there is no reason that I can think of to do so.

But it is possible that there is a magnetic effect, and that it is caused by magnetite nanoparticles (inside of, or not inside of lipid nanoparticles). Seriously though, without an external magnetic field I just can't see the purpose.

WRT "BOMBSHELL EXPOSED..."

A lot of what "the expert" said was incorrect. E.g.

We know that magnetofection is real, but we don't know the magnetic effect is real, so she was half right. Plus, magnetofection without an external magnetic field is basically useless. Having such a field in vivo doesn't make any sense either unless it was a really advanced device with pinpoint field accuracy, or just to hold the nanoparticles in place (like they say in the study) so they only interact with say, cells of the muscle (like to keep them from getting into the circulatory or lymphatic systems).

The particles themselves are probably not magnetic. They are like little iron-oxide balls. Iron magnets are magnetic because all of the little domains that produce magnetism are aligned in the same direction. That makes the whole big unit magnetic. That only happens when you make it happen (for the most part) by adding energy into the system, causing such an alignment of domains.

If something is produced randomly (like the magnetic nanoparticles) the domains will be misaligned. Now, because they are so small that might not be the case. I am not sure how domains align at that scale, however, if they are not misaligned then they would all clump together and their "Nanoparticle"ness would disappear, becoming just a clump that can do nothing. So the most likely case is that they are not themselves magnetic, but respond to an external magnetic field (which is what the literature says is their design purpose).

The papers also say they are not magnetic (paramagnetic means they are not themselves magnetic, but respond to an external field).

The person who was sticking things all over themselves I call bullshit. There is no way there is enough material OF ANY KIND in a shot to make something like that happen outside of a very localized spot. Plus its the only anecdotal case, so ya, total bullshit until proven otherwise.

She also made statements like:

It was intentionally added to these vaccines to make them a more aggressive delivery mechanism to get it into every cell.

There is no evidence for either of those statements. There is no evidence that the magnetite nanoparticles are in the vaccines at all, and no evidence that it is "more aggressive" than the lipid nanoparticles themselves. In fact without an external magnetic field I would think they would be less effective. And there is no evidence of any type of external directed magnetic field.

She said a bunch of other stuff that was wrong, but its too much to go into. She got more wrong or speculative than right.

Could the vaccines have these magnetite nanoparticles? Maybe.

Is there an obvious reason that they would? Not from a mechanical perspective that I can see.

The only reason I can think of that they would be in there at all, since they would almost certainly be LESS effective in vivo than the listed vaccine ingredients, would be to make people ask questions.

I.e., they could be in there because it makes them less effective, and its a white hat operation to make people ask WTF?