Email came through a couple weeks ago. They cited the EEOC or whatever’s decision on keeping a record of employees jab status. The email said that employees who have no jab card on record still have to wear masks. I work as a caregiver, those I care for have gotten the jab, but I don’t wear a mask regardless because I don’t work under a direct supervisor.
My question is... how is that not discrimination? Allowing privileges to some but not others based on personal choices
They compare it to the TB test we had to submit on hire that they keep record of. My argument there is that the TB test was a condition of employment upon hire, and that this vaccine wasn’t
Interesting read. Thank you fren. My worry here is that my state is an “at will” state or whatever. Employers can terminate without giving reason
it is damn hard to find good employees, lots of openings not a lot of qualified individuals. If I were you I would pre-mptively look for another better job that isn't require vax or mask, when you find it make sure your old company knows why you left.
Even in at-will states they cannot discriminate based on sex age or religion. However they can make up any other excuse to terminate you
arguably, wearing a mask, or getting the jab, is part of a religion. If you disagree with their religion, then if they terminate you, they are discriminating on the basis of religion.
Since fetal tissue is used to make all vaccines informing them of this should be able to exempt you.