Email came through a couple weeks ago. They cited the EEOC or whatever’s decision on keeping a record of employees jab status. The email said that employees who have no jab card on record still have to wear masks. I work as a caregiver, those I care for have gotten the jab, but I don’t wear a mask regardless because I don’t work under a direct supervisor.
My question is... how is that not discrimination? Allowing privileges to some but not others based on personal choices
They compare it to the TB test we had to submit on hire that they keep record of. My argument there is that the TB test was a condition of employment upon hire, and that this vaccine wasn’t
Check the America's Front Line Doctors site.
Get something to your HR department demanding in writing that, since taking the experimental gene therapy requires you to sign waivers releasing your health insurance company from covering any adverse effects, the company will be fully financially responsible for any negative health outcomes of the injection they are suddenly making a qualification of employment.
Provide links to the VAERS system (or an archive since they seem to be shut down) and anything else useful to your state and case.