First of all, the nice man at the pharma company will be more than happy to help with a proper methodology. Second, you can publish absolute dogshit as long as it fits the narrative. "Lancetgate" happened because it was beyond the pale and completely fake, and even then it was just a retraction without any real long-term consequences. If you make a paper without blatantly fake data you'll be fine.
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine"
Dr. Marcia Angell, former editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine
I think any with insight have reached the same conclusion as the good Doctor. I'm somewhat surprised she came forward. Medical Journals and Medical Academia have enjoyed an impeccable reputation for many decades. It seems obvious that their reputation was a well crafted illusion. Your Dogshit narrative is like a hand in a glove. Journals no longer inform motivated professionals. They exist largely to quash and discredit any counter-narrative.
I was initially surprised that the Lancet hoax gained no mainstream traction. Residual trust slowed my realization that the institution of Western Medicine is a hoax as well, and part of the cabal. If we were not born into and living in the "Matrix", then I defy anyone to come up with a better explanation.
Thanks for the info and the courtesy of your reply.
You don't even need the practice.
First of all, the nice man at the pharma company will be more than happy to help with a proper methodology. Second, you can publish absolute dogshit as long as it fits the narrative. "Lancetgate" happened because it was beyond the pale and completely fake, and even then it was just a retraction without any real long-term consequences. If you make a paper without blatantly fake data you'll be fine.
I think any with insight have reached the same conclusion as the good Doctor. I'm somewhat surprised she came forward. Medical Journals and Medical Academia have enjoyed an impeccable reputation for many decades. It seems obvious that their reputation was a well crafted illusion. Your Dogshit narrative is like a hand in a glove. Journals no longer inform motivated professionals. They exist largely to quash and discredit any counter-narrative.
I was initially surprised that the Lancet hoax gained no mainstream traction. Residual trust slowed my realization that the institution of Western Medicine is a hoax as well, and part of the cabal. If we were not born into and living in the "Matrix", then I defy anyone to come up with a better explanation.
Thanks for the info and the courtesy of your reply.