Seeking Medical Advice and Resources that Discuss the Safety/Danger and Benefits/Drawbacks of "Normal" Vaccines for a New Baby and the RhoGAM shot

posted 3 years ago by UnderCoverTrumper 3 years ago by UnderCoverTrumper +17 / -0

Hi Frens,

My husband and I are expecting our first baby in September. We are trying to figure out what to do about the "normal" vaccines for our baby. Neither my husband nor I are getting the experimental jab but we got all the regular vaccinations as kids.

We aren't sure if it's the right choice to vaccinate our child though. Q post 1010 mentions vaccines (not all) in a list of ways the cabal controls the population. Plus, we've both become really vaccine skeptical after seeing how nonsensical the covid "vaccine" is. On the other hand, my husband is terrified his crazy liberal in-laws will use not vaxxing as an excuse to try to legally get control of our kids.

If any of you know of any good resources/advice to help us make this decision, we'd really appreciate it. Maybe some vaccines are OK and others aren't? Any insights would be extremely appreciated.

The other thing we're trying to figure out is the RhoGAM shot. I'm O negative and my husband is A positive. So the baby might be Rh positive. Apparently if our blood comes into contact I may develop antibodies against the Rh factor and my body would attack future Rh positive babies. The midwife is recommending a RhoGAM shot. Apparently this is sourced from plasma donors. Does anyone know what the risk for that is with so many people having gotten the jab?

Thank you my frens.

26 comments

26 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (26)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– Bia2020 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Re: rhogam, don't take anyone's word for it. Do more research. The real problem is standard medical treatment of the laboring woman that causes the blood to mix. Positioning her flat on her back so labor takes longer and pushing is more difficult, drugs that increase strength of contractions (induction), etc. Btw, do yourself a huge favor and look up the natural progression of hormones released during labor and what hinders them, as well as the fetal ejection reflex and positions that interfere.

Re vaxes, look at all the research at childrenshealthdefense.org and physiciansforinformedconsent.org

permalink save report block reply

– UnderCoverTrumper [S] 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Yeah, we are planning for a natural child birth. No back labor, no drugs, no pain meds. So a lot of those factors shouldn't be in play unless something goes wrong and we have to transfer to a hospital.

Thanks for the websites, fren! I'm looking into them now.

permalink parent save report block reply