None of these random underlined words predicted anything, because no one was able to accurately forecast what was going to happen before it happened. You fit the data to the posts after the fact. That's a postdiction, not a prediction.

For this to be an actual prediction, you would've had to: read the posts, interpret them, publicly say what you believe is about to happen and why, and then that would have to come true. That is a prediction.

You're retrofitting. This is the same thing people do when they say Nostradamus "predicted" everything from the French Revolution to 9/11. They wait for an event to happen and then go back through his writings to cherry-pick pieces that look like they correspond to the event, ignoring the parts that don't. This is made easier because all his writings are vague and semi-mystical and leave lots of room for "interpretation" without saying anything concrete so they can't be definitively rejected. Sound like someone you know?