Though, objectivist thought is raycist as none of these terms are found in ZULU. and if they are found, they are later additions, devoid of abstractions, but made illustrative losing it's abstract content, and incapable to impart moral determination.
It also is a danger to their democracy and marxist ideology. Even worse, it favors a free market place and exchange of goods, services and thoughts.
For those not inclined to dab in philosophy, try watching Atlas Shrugged I - III. especially the parts where the philosophy of life, freedom and ownership are exemplified.
I like this better than Aldous Huxley, because this provides for developing your own antidote to framing and programming.
It took me weeks to read Atlas Shrugged the first time, many years ago. Now my paperback copy is worn, dog-eared, and highlighted everywhere. I need to get it out again, been awhile.
I like this! Keep it coming!
Though, objectivist thought is raycist as none of these terms are found in ZULU. and if they are found, they are later additions, devoid of abstractions, but made illustrative losing it's abstract content, and incapable to impart moral determination.
It also is a danger to their democracy and marxist ideology. Even worse, it favors a free market place and exchange of goods, services and thoughts.
For those not inclined to dab in philosophy, try watching Atlas Shrugged I - III. especially the parts where the philosophy of life, freedom and ownership are exemplified.
I like this better than Aldous Huxley, because this provides for developing your own antidote to framing and programming.
I hope so too. Though I also am conscious about the need to bridge a couple of things.
How does self interest relate to the golden rule? Could one be a Christian objectivist? Or a buddhist objectivist?
It took me weeks to read Atlas Shrugged the first time, many years ago. Now my paperback copy is worn, dog-eared, and highlighted everywhere. I need to get it out again, been awhile.