It is important to note in the previous SCOTUS ruling on the matter is that it is not "fraud vitiates all results", it is "fraud vitiates EVERYTHING".
Because the fraudulently elected was not put in office per constitutional requirements is means EVERYTHING they did in office is also revoked as they did not have the power to do it per the Constitution.
In Xiden's case, it means all federal appointments, all EOs and the best and most important - in the US to pass law requires it to pass Congress and be signed in by the President. Which means ANY law he signs becomes invalid since he does not have the authority to enter it into law.
It is important to note in the previous SCOTUS ruling on the matter is that it is not "fraud vitiates all results", it is "fraud vitiates EVERYTHING".
Because the fraudulently elected was not put in office per constitutional requirements is means EVERYTHING they did in office is also revoked as they did not have the power to do it per the Constitution.
In Xiden's case, it means all federal appointments, all EOs and the best and most important - in the US to pass law requires it to pass Congress and be signed in by the President. Which means ANY law he signs becomes invalid since he does not have the authority to enter it into law.