you are just another guy on the net spouting disagreements with other 'experts'
I'm actually someone who has presented an argument with details.
Only the argument matters....
Further your diatribe looks like you are intentionally trying to talk above peoples heads
I promise that is not what is happening. I'm trying really hard to make it NOT be that way. How do you condense more than a decade of schooling and experimentation into a few sentences? I have tried to explain the physical chemistry of it. That is really hard to do without diagrams, and all kinds of other information. I have tried to explain the biology of it which has the exact same problems. But I promise you, I am not doing this to stroke my own ego. That is just not something I give a crap about. I am trying to stop the spread of disinformation in the only way I know how; by presenting evidence and reasoned argument.
Of course you fail to realize or admit that other experts disagree with you.
I actually don't fail to realize that at all. The only disagreement I have seen by someone who actually may be an expert in fields related to this topic is the tweet from Luigi Warren who only made a statement, without context or argument or evidence.
Luigi is someone with direct ties to people who are very likely Cabal (head of Moderna), or Cabal puppets. He was instrumental in creating the vaccine ffs. The vaccine is almost certainly a Cabal designed tool. Anything he says is suspect. But something he says without any backing of evidence or reason is very suspect, especially when it feeds a divisive narrative.
My argument is based on physics and biology. Two areas I know very well. Regardless of how well I know them though, is that the arguments are self contained. Anyone who has sufficient knowledge can address the specifics of it, and I heartily welcome such debate. I beg for it in fact. That is the only path to the truth.
If you think there is another expert saying that the spike protein is shedding, please point me in their direction.
Its important to note that being an MD is far, far from being an expert in these fields. That doesn't mean that an MD won't be, it just means you don't have to be to be an MD, and in fact the vast majority aren't. That credential requires specialization, and very few specialize in cell and molecular biology, and even fewer in bio-nanoengineering; the two areas of expertise that are most necessary in determining what is going on with the vaccine in general, and the spike protein specifically, at least when the best we have to work with is anecdotes and theories.
If there was real evidence of spike protein shedding (measurements, data) then the theories I am putting forth would be moot. There is ZERO evidence of that, so the theories are by far the most important evidence. All physics, chemistry and biology say that a transmembrane protein getting out of the membrane are impossible. They say that if that miracle happened, the protein would refold instantly into something completely different, which would almost certainly not interact with the ACE-2 protein. That's just molecular biophysics. Whatever happens after those two very important pieces of information (for which i can supply a ridiculous amount of papers to support for other transmembrane proteins) is irrelevant. Those two pieces of information from theory and previous data show the impossibility of a TM protein leaving the membrane, and the turning off of the specific deleterious effects of ACE-2 activation if the miracle happened.
But we should listen to you because
You should not listen to me. You should listen to and address my arguments.
I'm actually someone who has presented an argument with details.
Only the argument matters....
I promise that is not what is happening. I'm trying really hard to make it NOT be that way. How do you condense more than a decade of schooling and experimentation into a few sentences? I have tried to explain the physical chemistry of it. That is really hard to do without diagrams, and all kinds of other information. I have tried to explain the biology of it which has the exact same problems. But I promise you, I am not doing this to stroke my own ego. That is just not something I give a crap about. I am trying to stop the spread of disinformation in the only way I know how; by presenting evidence and reasoned argument.
I actually don't fail to realize that at all. The only disagreement I have seen by someone who actually may be an expert in fields related to this topic is the tweet from Luigi Warren who only made a statement, without context or argument or evidence.
Luigi is someone with direct ties to people who are very likely Cabal (head of Moderna), or Cabal puppets. He was instrumental in creating the vaccine ffs. The vaccine is almost certainly a Cabal designed tool. Anything he says is suspect. But something he says without any backing of evidence or reason is very suspect, especially when it feeds a divisive narrative.
My argument is based on physics and biology. Two areas I know very well. Regardless of how well I know them though, is that the arguments are self contained. Anyone who has sufficient knowledge can address the specifics of it, and I heartily welcome such debate. I beg for it in fact. That is the only path to the truth.
If you think there is another expert saying that the spike protein is shedding, please point me in their direction.
Its important to note that being an MD is far, far from being an expert in these fields. That doesn't mean that an MD won't be, it just means you don't have to be to be an MD, and in fact the vast majority aren't. That credential requires specialization, and very few specialize in cell and molecular biology, and even fewer in bio-nanoengineering; the two areas of expertise that are most necessary in determining what is going on with the vaccine in general, and the spike protein specifically, at least when the best we have to work with is anecdotes and theories.
If there was real evidence of spike protein shedding (measurements, data) then the theories I am putting forth would be moot. There is ZERO evidence of that, so the theories are by far the most important evidence. All physics, chemistry and biology say that a transmembrane protein getting out of the membrane are impossible. They say that if that miracle happened, the protein would refold instantly into something completely different, which would almost certainly not interact with the ACE-2 protein. That's just molecular biophysics. Whatever happens after those two very important pieces of information (for which i can supply a ridiculous amount of papers to support for other transmembrane proteins) is irrelevant. Those two pieces of information from theory and previous data show the impossibility of a TM protein leaving the membrane, and the turning off of the specific deleterious effects of ACE-2 activation if the miracle happened.
You should not listen to me. You should listen to and address my arguments.
That is all that matters.