I think I understand now. The Pfizer papers are are the vaccine are protocols because new vaccines don't require new protocols and Dr. Warren, one of the vaccine inventors, explicitly stated that the vaccine sheds, but those two are not correlated. Dr. Warren apparently was wrong about everything and Pfizer included the very specific protocols because they were recycling science....
I have written countless protocols. They are mostly copy/paste. That is the way of academia (and documentation writing). In this case however, there are good reasons to keep it in, even if it is not directly applicable. Just because they are abusing the definition of the term "vaccine shedding" doesn't mean it isn't responsible science to keep an eye out for off target effects (which are not the same thing, but would have the same protocols).
I personally would have kept in the "vaccine shedding" protocols in a protocol I was writing on the mRNA immunotherapy technology even though its only indirectly applicable.
As for Dr. Warren there are three possibilities.
There is some completely different mechanism by which the spike protein is escaping the body. For example, an infected lung cell is exploding and blebs (mini cells walls (lipid membranes) without internal machinery) are escaping into the air. If this is what he meant, such an unlikely hypothetical would be so small of an effect as to be unmeasurable (and not even slightly harmful).
He said it because he is a DS operative and is purposefully spreading disinfo (as the inventor of the immunotherapy and BFF with the head of Moderna, my money is on this one).
He is insufficiently knowledgeable on membrane protein biophysics.
It seems to me you are trying to paint me as arrogant, and that that is my motivation for saying what I am saying.
From my perspective I am trying to help stop the spread of disinformation. If you keep asking questions in earnest, I will continue to answer in kind. I will try to present evidence when appropriate. If you see an instance where you think it should have been done and I have not done so, please let me know.
I think I understand now. The Pfizer papers are are the vaccine are protocols because new vaccines don't require new protocols and Dr. Warren, one of the vaccine inventors, explicitly stated that the vaccine sheds, but those two are not correlated. Dr. Warren apparently was wrong about everything and Pfizer included the very specific protocols because they were recycling science....
I have written countless protocols. They are mostly copy/paste. That is the way of academia (and documentation writing). In this case however, there are good reasons to keep it in, even if it is not directly applicable. Just because they are abusing the definition of the term "vaccine shedding" doesn't mean it isn't responsible science to keep an eye out for off target effects (which are not the same thing, but would have the same protocols).
I personally would have kept in the "vaccine shedding" protocols in a protocol I was writing on the mRNA immunotherapy technology even though its only indirectly applicable.
As for Dr. Warren there are three possibilities.
It seems to me you are trying to paint me as arrogant, and that that is my motivation for saying what I am saying.
From my perspective I am trying to help stop the spread of disinformation. If you keep asking questions in earnest, I will continue to answer in kind. I will try to present evidence when appropriate. If you see an instance where you think it should have been done and I have not done so, please let me know.
Maybe. time will tell.