So how would you debunk this? You just gonna brush it off as coincidence that he used the exact words of the Q post with a time stamp matching up exactly with the post that Q quoted? If only one of those connections was present id be skeptical too but two direct connections is very hard to brush off.
So how would you debunk this? You just gonna brush it off as coincidence that he used the exact words of the Q post with a time stamp matching up exactly with the post that Q quoted? If only one of those connections was present id be skeptical too but two direct connections is very hard to brush off.