1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well their "proof" is no widespread reporting that its happening. That ABC said there arent police reports confirming it. But the attorney general put out a statement saying theyre killing livestock and wildlife for food. A lot of those cats are outside cats and can be considered wildlife. Theres also the fact that eating cat is tradition in their country, so were expected to believe that these people are going to get rid of their tradition and respect our laws and communities when their very existence here is illegal on top of the insane increase in crime to the point where the attorney general needed to address it. Why might there not be widespread police reports when it happens? Well if its an outside cat the owner might not care enough to report it or might not notice right away the cat is gone. Also im sure a lot of people feel like the police just wont do anything about it, like its a waste of time when these people are protected from consequences

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

So wheres the proof this arrest even took place in ohio let alone recently? It takes time for bodycam footage to be released

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

This. And i think its hilarious how often i hear people say "shes a great pick because shes been the vice president, she has the experience needed!" As if her opponent wasnt literally elected president

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

$13m in public funding their party would receive automatically if they got X percent (can't remember the number) of the popular vote.

IIRC its 5%

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whats up with all the "Jill" signs??? Theres no way people are that fired up her. Thats the kind of treatment theyd put up for a presidential candidate. Wheres the "joe" signs? The "kamala" signs? Did they just hand out Jill signs at the door? Cause thats not organic, all of them are the same

3
Starseed 3 points ago +3 / -0

As long as sections are not locked by wikipedia admins then yes anyone can edit pages.

4
Starseed 4 points ago +4 / -0

I still dont know what the hell project 2025 is supposed to be. If its trumps policy then why did it appear out of nowhere near the end of the campaign and why does trump deny having anything to do with it?

6
Starseed 6 points ago +6 / -0

If it had to do with 2016 elections like it states then it also involves 2020. Criminals dont just stop committing crimes that they get away with. Id imagine its far easier to prosecute based on actions taken in a foreign country. America has too many people in high places with skin in the game, they are very protected here.

4
Starseed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looks like 6 fingers to me. The arm behind him is darker than the hand. Also how about that deformed pink phone the woman next to him is holding up

4
Starseed 4 points ago +4 / -0

"We diddnt have access to certain information" yeah like the info that Trump would turn his head at the last second causing your whole plan to fail. Imagine trying to spin and frame it as incompetence of that magnitude and still expect people to believe you

2
Starseed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats why i said "with proper oversight". Obviously ANY form of monitoring can be used for nefarious purposes. I havnt read the whole thing, just gave first impressions.

3
Starseed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. So if you can get a warrent based on that it forces these morons to either hide or suffer from lack of clout. Half these guys just want to look hard to impress people

3
Starseed 3 points ago +4 / -1

I mean the simple solution would be to not post pictures of your security measures for the whole internet to see. A pretty dumb thing to do. As long as theres proper oversight i could see this being an effective measure against gang activity in our cities. These wannabe thugs and degenerates love showing off their crimes for clout.

5
Starseed 5 points ago +5 / -0

So why did K and SS just stand there??

Because if they rushed him off or turned him around it would be 1000% completely obvious he was lost. By standing there looking more or less calm they can say that he was simply going on board to talk to someone. Even though the charade is exposed theyre still locked into it.

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably because nothing else that far away is moving. Ive seen plenty of low quality video that has stuff like that happen. Bottom line is the person keeps moving after the flicker. I mean the red circle follows it, its very obvious.

8
Starseed 8 points ago +8 / -0

Spies aligned with the royal family are tasked with pushing propaganda??!??!

shockedpikachuface.jpg

1
Starseed 1 point ago +3 / -2

Everyone can clearly see the Trump assassin setting up his rifle on the roof in this new video

Lmfao are we seeing the same video? You cant tell anything from this video other than someone was walking on that roof.

4
Starseed 4 points ago +4 / -0

But wait, that person wouldnt be allowed to shoot you, they have to make an attempt to retreat first! Then youre allowed to attempt to retreat before you can shoot

1
Starseed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah i remember getting some of those. But the amount of kamala ads is kinda crazy. They really are in panic mode

2
Starseed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Btw, I could not see anyone walking to the right, could you provide a pic?

I mean just rewatch the video, the red circle follows the person. Right after the figure flickers it reappears and keeps moving. Its just poor camera quality. To say this is the shooter being taken out is to ignore the fact that the person keeps walking. What im more interested in is seeing a video of the shooter actually walking on the roof. Every other video shows him crawling or laying down

3
Starseed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Im missing the part where anything in this video shows the shooter being taken out. The flicker is not the person falling because you can see them walk to the right literally right after it disappears for that brief second. Do dead people walk?

2
Starseed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im no camera expert but it just looks like poor camera quality is causing that flickering effect. Cause you can still see the figure walking after the flicker

view more: Next ›