Be careful who you follow... So who do you follow?

posted 3 years ago by lilsparrow 3 years ago by lilsparrow +31 / -0

I try to listen to a varying of people. Before anyone gets on my case, I take everything with at least 3 grains of salt, I'm aware misinformation is necessary, and I know there are some people who others don't like for various reasons.

My. Urrent roster fornthose I cycle through for information is:

Scott McKay Nicholas Veniamin Simon Parkes Nino Rodriguez Cirsten W Amanda Grace Dave X22 LT And We Know And when they guest on someone elses show (Michael Jaco, Charlie Ward, Gene Decode, Robert David Steele, Juan O'Savin and Jason Q (the Gemtria numbers guy I think)

I listen with the assumption that these people bot are telling the truth and possibly giving misinformation, so that I can keep myself level headed and attempt to discern what is happening in the world verses what the above individuals share.

I know that there is infiltration and drama stirring between some of these people directly.

My issue though, of this listen, the only one who seems to constantly be stirring up trouble is Cirsten. I'm notnsure its an attitude thing, but something is just very off for me when Inhear her complain about certain people, how she clings to Scott as her friend for validation of her claims, and that the aer aboutnher gives.me the impression of "if you even question me, your gone."

I know, I know, the trolls.

But I've been around the GamerGate and ComicsGate trains. Not thatbshe is one, but her attitude sucks something fierce out of the sjw cancel culture echo chamber.

Am I the only one who sees this? Is my criticisms valid, or am I just being overly conscious?

Thoughts please?

21 comments

21 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (21)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– anon1138 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Personally I listen to most of this list. I also listen to HealthImpactNews and Stew Peters. I watch everything that fauxi says. I listen for the substantive segments from msm (I have not found any that include facts not already provided by our alternative news sources and this board), what little they provide is generally not backed up.

For instance, when the article was published by MIT about how we have a high understanding about the facts and data, but we have come to the "wrong" conclusion. They did not explain how we came to the "wrong" conclusion nor how to "properly" interpret the data they provide. It here is the data, it supports us, here is the acceptable conclusion, don't worry how we got there

permalink save report block reply