Let’s contribute to debunking the misinformation contained herein, point-by-point... then let’s share the hell out of it!
But if we find ourselves wrong on any assertions or assumptions, let’s use it to tighten our arguments.
Let’s contribute to debunking the misinformation contained herein, point-by-point... then let’s share the hell out of it!
But if we find ourselves wrong on any assertions or assumptions, let’s use it to tighten our arguments.
This is a common refrain throughout:
“Lindell equates these alleged pcap files with video of a bank being robbed, but in that analogy, a bank robbery investigator would also need to say WHERE that video came from, how it got from the source to you (chain of custody), how you got your hands on it, and how you know it is legitimate. He does none of those things yet these would likely be the first questions that would be asked if this data was ever presented to a court.”
Essentially, the argument goes: since the actual evidence cited by Lindell hasn’t been presented to a court for verification, the evidence isn’t real.