Biden 2.5 hours late 3 year delta. Coincidence?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (32)
sorted by:
I don't think you read my comment if you think I'm trying to divide anyone, or believed your hostile and defensive attitude was a necessary reaction.
There is plenty of proof. Anyone who hasn't seen enough proof that there is validity in Q drops will likely never see it. This may be a prediction, I never said it wasn't. I simply asked, "what do we do with the information if that's the case?" and suggested that looking into the potential meaning (cause) behind a 2.5 hour delay would likely be time better spent, because there's a much higher chance it was called out to draw our attention to it, rather than to be an empty proof.
I have learned plenty. There have been suggestions about who to watch with scrutiny to see their roles in things kept from the public eye, as well as those they unwittingly implicate with their facial reactions.
It seems odd that someone who demands everyone accept the infallibility of all Q interpretations imply in question that we aren't meant to learn anything from the proofs.
I don't understand why learning something equates to doubting something. If you believe that suggesting there is something more to learn from the drop is the same as an irrational disbelief in it being a prediction, I suppose there's no hope for constructive discourse.
I never said or implied this. I said it was more probable that there is more to it (which is backed by the evidence of past proofs), and our time would be better spent looking into things that would be beneficial to our understanding of the events, rather than determining if it was a prediction of yesterday's events, which is substantially less important, especially for those that already know Q drops aren't fancy. Otherwise, we would be like the foolish "theologians" and historians who spend so much time trying to figure out the historical (material) circumstances of Biblical accounts, past or future, that they are completely blind to the messages contained therein.
Hope or optimism should never be a substitute for seeking truth. If you believe the only purpose of Q drops is to provide blind hope, I would argue you have a lot more research to do.
What? No, that's not even remotely what I said. Reading comprehension is a valuable thing.
Goodness, your defensiveness is misdirected.