Was it more of the "Q is Jim Watkins" bs? I'd honestly be open to a debunking of Q, but I don't think it would be one of those "they just want people trusting the plan while they usher in the new world order" sort of takes. I'm looking for the kind of guy that says the democrats are still bad, but all of the major figures touting Q theories are controlled opposition and the whole idea of Q was just a misdirection from pizzagate. If somebody debunks Q as a potential savior from political corruption and Moloch worshipers, but still acknowledges the corruption exists, that would be the best way to frame it for me to be potentially convinced.
Was it more of the "Q is Jim Watkins" bs? I'd honestly be open to a debunking of Q, but I don't think it would be one of those "they just want people trusting the plan while they usher in the new world order" sort of takes. I'm looking for the kind of guy that says the democrats are still bad, but all of the major figures touting Q theories are controlled opposition and the whole idea of Q was just a misdirection from pizzagate. If somebody debunks Q as a potential savior from political corruption and Moloch worshipers, but still acknowledges the corruption exists, that would be the best way to frame it for me to be potentially convinced.