101
lsdQ 101 points ago +101 / -0

Declaring administrative hearings a violation of the 7th amendment is an enormous ruling. it's been considered constitutional because you can always appeal the agency ruling in district court, which is incredibly expensive and as a result almost noone ever does it, but you theoretically can.

If SCOTUS backs this it will basically dismantle the administrative state.

Link to the ruling: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-61007-CV0.pdf

1
lsdQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well said. Can I ask why you don't believe any more?

2
lsdQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t watch TV so a lot of shows fly under my radar (unless it’s discussed here). Saw this ad for a Hulu show and was astonished by the title, so had to dig further into this travesty of a show.

Here’s the synopsis:

“Breeders

"Breeders" explores the paradox experienced by nearly all parents, the willingness to die for one's children coupled with the near-constant desire to kill them. Paul is a caring father who discovers he's not quite the man he thought he was. His partner, Ally, runs a recording studio, makes Paul laugh and has the ability to read a story to their children while she's technically asleep. In this honest and uncompromising comedy, Paul and Ally are juggling full-time careers, aging parents, a mortgage, upheavals in their relationship and the unenviable curveballs of parenting their young children, Luke and Ava. When Ally's estranged father Michael appears on their doorstep, the family essentially takes on a third child three quarters of the time, but this one comes with baggage and opinions. Paul's own parents, Jackie and Jim, are on hand to help out, but their generation does parenting a little differently.”

Here’s a trailer if you’re so inclined: https://youtu.be/7IU1jFcDHvI

9
lsdQ 9 points ago +9 / -0

Something tells me Clarence is going to be one of the few ones in our government who will come out unscathed after the Storm.

3
lsdQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder what sort of upcoming federal action these "reports" are laying the groundwork for? 🤔

31
lsdQ 31 points ago +31 / -0

daughter she fathered

daughter she fathered

daughter she fathered

1
lsdQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pretty sure it’s their way of associating Christianity with “white supremacy” in the readers mind (since they already routinely use “white supremacy” and “white nationalism” interchangeably). Libs love to play these little rhetorical games.

7
lsdQ 7 points ago +7 / -0

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000180-874f-dd36-a38c-c74f98520000

Correction to the OP: this is a draft opinion that was “leaked”. It is not officially struck down yet.

3
lsdQ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I stole the meme, but thought it was funny could be read two ways 😂

Also, don't be a spelling nazi, that's a lib thing! :)

2
lsdQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure if you're just arguing for the sake of arguing, but pretty much all what you're saying supports him being part of the cabal and being a Rothschild/Khazar.

All the world is a stage for these people.

1
lsdQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hitler having Rothschild blood fits with him being a puppet/part of the cabal.

2
lsdQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not commenting on RRN legitimacy or lack thereof, but including a disclaimer like this would be a good strategy to avoid lawsuits or help defend in a lawsuit.

view more: Next ›