Do you mean this?
Only thing I can find on her saying this, but this is satire.
Here you go, I put it on catbox for you:
I don’t watch TV so a lot of shows fly under my radar (unless it’s discussed here). Saw this ad for a Hulu show and was astonished by the title, so had to dig further into this travesty of a show.
Here’s the synopsis:
“Breeders
"Breeders" explores the paradox experienced by nearly all parents, the willingness to die for one's children coupled with the near-constant desire to kill them. Paul is a caring father who discovers he's not quite the man he thought he was. His partner, Ally, runs a recording studio, makes Paul laugh and has the ability to read a story to their children while she's technically asleep. In this honest and uncompromising comedy, Paul and Ally are juggling full-time careers, aging parents, a mortgage, upheavals in their relationship and the unenviable curveballs of parenting their young children, Luke and Ava. When Ally's estranged father Michael appears on their doorstep, the family essentially takes on a third child three quarters of the time, but this one comes with baggage and opinions. Paul's own parents, Jackie and Jim, are on hand to help out, but their generation does parenting a little differently.”
Here’s a trailer if you’re so inclined: https://youtu.be/7IU1jFcDHvI
The original: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FSfAY7vXoAMnxjI?format=jpg&name=large
(GAW shrinks the images, and this one has very fine text size)
Lmao
This isnt the complete version though. Here it is:
Pretty sure it’s their way of associating Christianity with “white supremacy” in the readers mind (since they already routinely use “white supremacy” and “white nationalism” interchangeably). Libs love to play these little rhetorical games.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000180-874f-dd36-a38c-c74f98520000
Correction to the OP: this is a draft opinion that was “leaked”. It is not officially struck down yet.
Declaring administrative hearings a violation of the 7th amendment is an enormous ruling. it's been considered constitutional because you can always appeal the agency ruling in district court, which is incredibly expensive and as a result almost noone ever does it, but you theoretically can.
If SCOTUS backs this it will basically dismantle the administrative state.
Link to the ruling: https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/20/20-61007-CV0.pdf