FTA: The vaccine, while triggering an immune response, DID NOT STOP the virus from entering every organ in the body. The viral RNA was found in virtually every organ in the body, which means the spike proteins as well. There are antibodies (like the “vaccine” is supposed to create) but they’re irrelevant because, based on a study from Japan, we now know that the spike S1 protein is what does the damage. According to the published postmortem report, the vaccinated man was 86 years old and tested NEGATIVE for COVID-19 when first admitted to the hospital with severe gastro-intestinal trouble and difficulty breathing...So the damage to the organs of the now dead vaccine recipient, took place BEFORE he was infected with COVID by the other hospital room patient. Worse, once the vaccinated man actually got COVID, it spread so fast within his body, he apparently never stood a chance.
There is a lot more info in the article.
Let's unpack this ...
(1) 86-year old man lives in a retirement home.
(2) Previous medical history includes high blood pressure, poor blood flow, prostate cancer, and dementia.
(3) He receives the Pfizer Covid expeirmental drug, which artificially induces the body to produce spike proteins.
(4) 18 days later, he feels sick with "worsening diarrhea," and goes to the hospital. There, he is further found to have ulcerative colitis, due to blood clots.
(5) Antigen and PCR tests -- which DO NOT DIAGNOSE ANYTHING -- are "negative," so the "medical experts" conclude he is Covid-negative.
(6) The man dies 4 days after being admitted to the hspital.
(7) 2 days after that, an autopsy reveals deceased man has "Covid RNA" in all organs of the body.
The subjecct had been in a hospital room with a "Covid-positive" patient, according to hospital staff (who are ALSO uniformed about all of this), and they conclude that the other patient "gave Covid to" the deceased man. Poor conclusion, NOT based on evidence (or SCIENCE).
Conclusions of the "medical experts" are: (a) other patient "gave Covid" to subject patient, subject patient then died "from Covid," (b) damage to organs took place before being "infected with Covid," (c) once patient "got Covid," the Covid "spread so fast within his body, he apparently never stood a chance," and (c) either the "vaccination" (i.e. experimental drug) did not work, or made the Covid "spread faster."
None of those conclusions make any sense.
First, the antigen and PCR tests are NOT diagnostic tools. They do NOT tell us if someone is sick with Covid or not. They are reported to provide anywhere from 90%-97% false positives. In truth, they are 100% false positive AND negative because they are NOT DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS.
Therefore, there is ZERO chance that we KNOW that Patient A "gave Covid" to Patient B.
Second, there is ZERO evidence that the subject patient died "FROM COVID." He was admitted with SEVERE DIARRHEA. This is a leading cause of DEATH in many parts of Africa. This could have been the cause of death, but it seems that possibility was never explored. It should have been the FIRST thing they looked at, since that was the REASON HE WENT TO THE HOSPITAL IN THE FIRST PLACE.
In addition, he had BLOOD CLOTS, which has widely been reported after receivind these experimental drugs. The Pfizer jab might have been the cause of the blood clots, which might have been the cause of death. This, too, seems to never have been investigated.
Third, since there is no way to know WHEN (or IF) the patient got "sick FROM Covid," there is also no reason to conclude that any damage to organs were caused "before being infected with Covid." A more reasonable possibility would be that the Covid "vaccine" (experimental drug) is what caused the damage to the organs.
Fourth, the idea that the "Covid spread so fast within his body" is a made-up fantasy. We don't KNOW if he had Covid at all. If he did, there is no evidence that a fast spreading, causing almost-immediate death, has happened in anyone else. It is PURE SPECULATION, and it is IRRESPONSIBLE for any medical "profession" to engage in such harm to his profession. The obvious thing to look at is the fact that an 86-year old man with previous health conditions had an experimental drug injected into him, and was DEAD within THREE WEEKS thereafter. Why is THIS not considered ... at all?
Finally, there is no evidence to either support or refute whether or not the "vaccine" (experimental drug) had any effect on Covid, or if the man even had Covid at all.
But, he DID have the vaccine, a chronic health history, severe diarrhea that can kill people, and blood clots that can also kill and have been widely reported to be caused by these experimental drugs.
EXTREMELY poor work by the medical "insider" who gave this story to the author.
This is the horrific state of today's medical industry. 98% of them are just a bunch of sheep, masquerading as experts.