When Immunity from Liability Applies
When the Secretary determines that a threat or condition constitutes a present or credible risk of a future public health emergency, the Secretary may issue a PREP Act declaration. The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused by, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from the administration or use of covered countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions identified in the declaration.
[Bolded for emphasis]
It says nothing here (or in the rest of that page) anything about it being restricted to only under an EUA. Instead it seems to give the determination to "the Secretary" on whether or not a threat exists.
"Thus, in order to meet the definition of a qualified pandemic or epidemic product, a product
(1) must be used for COVID-19; and
(2) must be
(a) approved, licensed, or cleared by FDA;
(b) authorized under an EUA;
(c) described in an EUI; or
(d) used under either an Investigational New Drug (IND)
application or an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). 6"
I may not be interpreting this correctly, and I did not read the entire opinion, but this seems to state that an FDA approved product also qualifies for the exemptions laid out in the Prep Act.
I'm not 100%, but it seems they will retain their immunity from liability after FDA approval.
On the other hand, I'm not convinced that the Prep Act is legal at all. So we shall see.
This is a bioweapon. The virus and the jab -- both bioweapons
The CDC was funded by the vaccine companies, and the CDC used those funds to engineer the virus. The vaccines were created before the virus was released.
All provable statements.
However, unless it goes before a court of law that is not Cabal controlled, there is no way to prove willful misconduct.
There is no reason that couldn't have already happened, yet it hasn't. I think it is very likely it will happen eventually, but there is no reason to suspect it will happen before it is FDA approved, especially if they rush it.
There is evidence because the receiver can sue big pharma for damages from the vaccine upon approval. The main advantage of EUA is big pharma doesn't need to be liable for anything.
FDA won't approve it because it will open up the liability for their masters aka big pharma.
Thank you for pointing me in the right direction (from below, but moved up so its part of the page).
From Liability Immunity Provisions from the Prep Act on Public Health Emergency .gov
[Bolded for emphasis]
It says nothing here (or in the rest of that page) anything about it being restricted to only under an EUA. Instead it seems to give the determination to "the Secretary" on whether or not a threat exists.
From an HHS Advisory Opinion on this act:
"Thus, in order to meet the definition of a qualified pandemic or epidemic product, a product
(1) must be used for COVID-19; and
(2) must be
(a) approved, licensed, or cleared by FDA;
(b) authorized under an EUA;
(c) described in an EUI; or
(d) used under either an Investigational New Drug (IND) application or an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). 6"
I may not be interpreting this correctly, and I did not read the entire opinion, but this seems to state that an FDA approved product also qualifies for the exemptions laid out in the Prep Act.
I'm not 100%, but it seems they will retain their immunity from liability after FDA approval.
On the other hand, I'm not convinced that the Prep Act is legal at all. So we shall see.
This is a bioweapon.
The virus and the jab -- both bioweapons.
Sounds like willful misconduct to me.
The CDC was funded by the vaccine companies, and the CDC used those funds to engineer the virus. The vaccines were created before the virus was released.
All provable statements.
However, unless it goes before a court of law that is not Cabal controlled, there is no way to prove willful misconduct.
There is no reason that couldn't have already happened, yet it hasn't. I think it is very likely it will happen eventually, but there is no reason to suspect it will happen before it is FDA approved, especially if they rush it.
Will it?
What is the evidence for this?
If true, it might happen because of this reason.
Evidence is big pharma lied, people died.
So there is no evidence that big pharma will be liable if the FDA approves it?
They currently have no liability. I was wondering if that might legally change upon FDA approval.
There is evidence because the receiver can sue big pharma for damages from the vaccine upon approval. The main advantage of EUA is big pharma doesn't need to be liable for anything.