These CNN fucktards have no idea how forensic analyses work and why / how they're admissible in court as evidence (as opposed to 3rd-party hearsay). It does not require observation while in process.
When BC is done, not only will there be a report of what he found, but a separate report of exactly what processes he used. It's up to the opposing side to recreate what he did on the same image to validate or refute his results.
It's science: follow the same steps and get the same results, and you've verified the data itself.
They are shitting razor blades because they know it's true. Now we need some pipehitters out guarding his driveway, this report was nothing more than a doxxing attempt.
These CNN fucktards have no idea how forensic analyses work and why / how they're admissible in court as evidence (as opposed to 3rd-party hearsay). It does not require observation while in process.
When BC is done, not only will there be a report of what he found, but a separate report of exactly what processes he used. It's up to the opposing side to recreate what he did on the same image to validate or refute his results.
It's science: follow the same steps and get the same results, and you've verified the data itself.
They are shitting razor blades because they know it's true. Now we need some pipehitters out guarding his driveway, this report was nothing more than a doxxing attempt.