By stating a limited view of a fact. One specifically designed to imply guilt.
The mere fact that you mention the accusation without mentioning that the case was dismissed in the following sentence is prima facie evidence that you are pushing a narrative of guilt.
You implied it.
By stating a limited view of a fact. One specifically designed to imply guilt.
The mere fact that you mention the accusation without mentioning that the case was dismissed in the following sentence is prima facie evidence that you are pushing a narrative of guilt.
It's crazy that so many people, you included, do not even understand what exactly they are saying.
The post you responded to classifies as an "observation".
This one is a retort. You're too butthurt to think straight.