2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn't trying to correct you lol. Just pointing it out for those who aren't good at maths :)

3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's 17 months and 17 days.

8
yep__yep__yep 8 points ago +8 / -0

My ex fiance lied to me about her vax. She would agree with everything I showed her, all the proof that it's not only not necessary, but it's a risk she didn't need to take.

She's fine, multiple boosters and vaxes.. We split because she keeps secrets and refuses to at least discuss the vax beforehand.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

It happens! People think blanks are totally safe and point blank shoot themselves or their friends, and end up killing that friend or dead themselves.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't make anything I said false, so what's your point? Nobody made sure the gun was unloaded, completely free of live ammunition, or made inoperable. , and that let Baldwin kill someone... What does it being a revolver have anything to do with my point?

Actually, can you articulate what my point even was, because I'm almost positive you missed it.

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but that's why there are supposed to be weapons experts on scene to ensure the guns used in movies are either incapable of firing, or absolutely unloaded.

I understand your point, and that's how I treat guns too. They're always loaded, even if you just unloaded it, but different reasons to have a gun, and reasons to aim it at people consentingly, securely, and safely. And before you hit me with "IT'S NEVER SAFE", they usually remove the firing pin, use a solid dummy magazine, and block the barrel and chamber... If two consenting adults want to do that in a theatrical setting, then so be it, it's safe enough for them.

Of course, there's blanks, but that's a whole different story with different safety regulations because blanks can still kill you with air pressure.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks, lol. Cool name, by the way. OG username

3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh shit, if anyone is a fan of Elder Scrolls and Hindu theism, this might be a pretty cool battle!

4
yep__yep__yep 4 points ago +4 / -0

They all said it last time, and it was a lie... They're all just liars.

by skytlrh
1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, my bad man. Maybe I was just in a bad mood... Work was rough that day, and I didn't mean to come off like an asshole.. I actually agree with you to a large extent. Cops actually never have their guns taken from them, that was a lie... and these women are IMPERVIOUS to someone taking their gun... It's actually impossible, believe it or not...

Hypothetically if cops did have their guns taken from them, then if only all officers saw this or let YOU teach them, then maybe they'd be a little safer.

Godspeed, and best of luck 🙏

by skytlrh
2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +3 / -1

What a stupid take 😂

Guns get forcibly used against legal open carry users all the time. It literally happens to police officers who have retention training and special 3 point retention holsters.. Cops make it hard for criminals to take their guns from them, but it still happens.

These women made it easy by not knowing correct holster positioning. This is neither hip carry NOR appendix carry. This is buttcheek/back pocket carry, and that's retarded.

Disagree if you want, I bet it'll be funny.

Do you even carry?

by skytlrh
3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

What a slick Rico Suave able to undo a bra strap while waiting in line at the ATM

by skytlrh
2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Including "watch her squeal" was probably in bad taste 😂 we got your point

by skytlrh
3
yep__yep__yep 3 points ago +3 / -0

You missed the point.

She is carrying a firearm inappropriately and non-securely. This is not appropriate firearm carry, and it puts herself at GREATER risk than if she just carried the firearm correctly in the first place.

Btw, where do you find your ladies with balls? Thailand? This isn't normal, fren. Don't associate with a lady who has balls.

0
yep__yep__yep 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why is this photoshopped? 😂 You could have just made the sign for real.

The letters are all chopped up and skewed.

4
yep__yep__yep 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's a handshake. Take it with a massive grain of salt. I've never heard that either. As far as I know, Assange is still a national hero.

Dude is either confused or he's intentionally spreading misinfo/disinfo.

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hey senate... How did Mossad get that leaked sex tape?

2
yep__yep__yep 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree wholeheartedly. It's a viscous cycle for many kids, who then get that behavior reinforced by other people smoking a lot of weed as well. It's an echo chamber of people convincing themselves they aren't sick. I was in that echo chamber too!

And I had assumed that you're almost certainly older than me. I'm in my mid 30s now and sober as the ocean. I'll occasionally have a beer at family reunions but my last beer was well over a year ago now.

Age doesn't always equal wisdom. However, failing a lot and making a lot of mistakes throughout my life and learning from those mistakes does

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

I definitely wouldn't say I'm anti-vax necessarily. I'm certainly against the MRNA vaccine, seeing as they literally changed the definition of "vaccine" so they could call it one.. But I still support people getting actual "weakened viral sample" vaccines.

And I'm certainly not anti-medicine, just against the for-profit circle jerk of treating symptoms with "medicines" that make people sick in other ways too.

Well hey, I appreciate you being civil with me about this. You didn't just scream "REEE!!! SHILL!!" when I said something contrary to your beliefs. We need more dialogue like this in this world. God bless for that.

I hear your points, and I get them. I'm not sure I agree that MMS has a perfect track record of never having devistating effects on peoples health... You said that thousands have taken it without incident, but same goes for any drug of any kind. Thousands of people eat oily greasy slop from fast food joints every day, and while they aren't dying immediately out of the drive thru, heart disease is still the number one cause of death in America... I wouldnt say thousands of people eat at Jack in the Box without incident, though... Or just because people drive their cars every day and never seem to get into any accidents, they are still just as likely to actually crash, regardless of if they've crashed before or not. Bad analogy, but I think it demonstrates what I'm trying to articulate, lol.

I think we're both just skeptics trying to find the even truth. And I wish you the best :)

Edit: a better analogy would be the regular consumption of Marijuana. Most medical professionals would say not to smoke weed every day but ask almost stoner if they think it's unhealthy or dangerous to get high daily... As someone who smoked daily for years, I can by a first hand account honestly list the various ways that it has negatively impacted my health. My testosterone levels were so low from the regular consumption, I had given myself an undiagnosable illness called CHS, which makes you violently vomit in the mornings WITH OR WITHOUT weed. I relied on it for depression and boredom. My memory was that of a 65 year old in my mid 20s... There was a LOT going wrong, but I would never have admitted it, because it allowed me to sleep at night (chronic insomnia since early childhood)... Most stoners would be quick to blame those issues on other things before accepting that consuming weed long enough might have been what caused it... I sure as FUCK would never have admitted it, because I didn't believe it. Too many people supporting it to step back and look at it critically.

Food for thought.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ivermectin is not horse medicine... Ivermectin has decades and decades of use in human beings with proven efficacy.

If you think I'm shitting on medicine the government doesn't like, you're mistaken. I oppose the pharmaceutical industry with a passion... But the problem is that when some people reject the pharmaceutical industry, they fill that vacuum with someone else who sounds confident.

That's why I mentioned that MMS is usually rejected by people on both sides of any political, conspiratorial, or medical compass... Republican sources, Democrat sources, independent sources, and conspiratorial sources, are all willing to say that this mix sold by Jim is not safe for human consumption.

Just because it hasn't sent you to the hospital or killed you DOESN'T mean it's working. Whenever you're sold a "cure all", which MMS is reported to cure everything from depression, to cancer, blindness, and seizures.... There is no medicine in the world that cures everything, and if someone tells you it does, they're LYING or they're just WRONG.

Edit: and not that I'm a medical professional, but I absolutely do try my best to research everything I put into my body. ABSOLUTELY take Ivermectin to get rid of covid. It's not only an anti parasitic, but also an antiviral. It makes it impossible for the virus to reproduce in the body, and cures covid.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do not pedel MMS if that stands for Miracle Mineral Solution. For those unaware, MMS (Miracle Mineral Solution) is a pseudoscience concoction sold by a scientologist, named Jim Humble.

The main ingredient is Chlorine Dioxide. The method of consumption is usually by drinking after mildly diluting it. The ratios that Jim Humble suggests consuming this chemical is DANGEROUS and cautioned against by almost every side of the health world globally, and the entire political or conspiratorial spectrum...

If you're MMS is something else, then I apologize. But if you mean Miracle Mineral Solution (Chlorine Dioxide), then please please let's talk. It can be via DMs or right here. Anywhere you like.

You are absolutely not supposed to ingest those ratios of chlorine. Yes, you can purify water with Chlorine Dioxide tablets, but the ratios are VASTLY reduced and you need to let the water sit before drinking so the chlorine evaporates...

5
yep__yep__yep 5 points ago +5 / -0

I imagine the response would be something like "as a large language model, I lack the ability to lie, deceive, or misconstrue information intentionally without being directed to do so. It is important to remember that lying is ethically and morally wrong, and you should never do it."

I play with AI too much lol

view more: Next ›