The ironic thing is, there would be no HIV to end if the liberal darling, Fauci, hadn't started it and then promoted AZT, a hazardous substance, as a cure.
And there, we reach the crux of the problem: immunosuppressants. The pharmaceutical industry peddles them. They're in the foods we eat, the water we drink, drugs, cigarettes, etc.
On the subject of Fauci, HIV, if it has any real effect at all (the dr who discovered it became a mockery when he presented evidence that it does not cause AIDS), it is more than likely a result of gain of function research. I remember a man who claimed he was involved in the creation of the virus saying that it had elements of cat lymphoma, chicken sarcoma, and Simian Virus 1.
The ironic thing is, there would be no HIV to end if the liberal darling, Fauci, hadn't started it and then promoted AZT, a hazardous substance, as a cure.
Yeah, I don't know why this isn't getting more attention.
And there, we reach the crux of the problem: immunosuppressants. The pharmaceutical industry peddles them. They're in the foods we eat, the water we drink, drugs, cigarettes, etc.
On the subject of Fauci, HIV, if it has any real effect at all (the dr who discovered it became a mockery when he presented evidence that it does not cause AIDS), it is more than likely a result of gain of function research. I remember a man who claimed he was involved in the creation of the virus saying that it had elements of cat lymphoma, chicken sarcoma, and Simian Virus 1.
There would still be HIV. It just wouldn't be as wide spread.