I read a book a long time ago written by someone very close to the intel community. One of the things that stood out is he said that the CIA is in the business of keeping secrets. They only tell you what they want you to her, to manipulate you
I know this concerns the DIA, not the FBI, or CIA, but I wonder if the same could be said about the DIA also.
I know from certain Q post that the DIA is supposed to be more White Hatty, but I also remember Q taught us to QUESTION EVERYTHING.
I am a bit reluctant to take this story at face value. If we know his name, it not because it leaked, it's because they want us to know it. If we have information on what he has provided, that information did not leak, it's exactly what they want us to know, but why is the question.
We should always look at every story of this nature with a sceptical mind. Don't tale anything at face value.
He most likely got all the dirt of everyone and he also properly worked with DIA for a long time.
This guy could actually be an unsung hero and might have had a big part in winning this war.
I read a book a long time ago written by someone very close to the intel community. One of the things that stood out is he said that the CIA is in the business of keeping secrets. They only tell you what they want you to her, to manipulate you
I know this concerns the DIA, not the FBI, or CIA, but I wonder if the same could be said about the DIA also.
I know from certain Q post that the DIA is supposed to be more White Hatty, but I also remember Q taught us to QUESTION EVERYTHING.
I am a bit reluctant to take this story at face value. If we know his name, it not because it leaked, it's because they want us to know it. If we have information on what he has provided, that information did not leak, it's exactly what they want us to know, but why is the question.
We should always look at every story of this nature with a sceptical mind. Don't tale anything at face value.
You defiantly right about that