No they don't want everyone sterile. Just about 70% and they get to decide who reproduces. And they want everyone promiscuous at the moment simply to break the old structures down. Once they are in charge no such degeneracy will be available for the plebs (bad for cohesion, self control is vital for stable societies)
Eugenics. It's a thing. Look it up.
LOL 'indoctrinated with YouTube videos'? Bitch, I was studying this crap likely before you were born and I don't need some dumbass who clearly thinks they know everything from a few New Age sites. Claiming someone gets their info from YouTube vids is very millenial of you.
Books. Great things. Old texts even better. They even have bibliographies for further research.
You said it yourself. They want people sterile so they can control reproduction which pretty much points out that the guidestones are not an NWO agenda.
I've been awake for over 29!years and I can see that everything your saying, inudingbthat the guidestones are NWO comes from a video or blog.
Boone, including you would read the guidestones and conclude they are NWO. None of the guidances are inline with NWO.
Don't forget, God himself reduced the world's population in order to destroy the systems and cultures of man.
Many people forsee that a catastrophe like that is the only thing that can give humanity a chances to get on the right track.
Many people believe that mankind is going to do to itself by human folly, what God did with Noah and the flood.
Sure, the NWO also knows that it's our only chance and so they are trying to orchistrate that by taking the reduction of humanities population in their own hands, but just because other people foresee a catastrophe thelat reduces the population doesn't mean they are NWO.
You would be able to tell they were NWO by the other things they believe. You would be able to tell by the context that was in. In this case the context is in opposition to NWO ideology.
I have gone through the list and pointed out how none of those are NWO agneda and no one has even bothered to argue against me. Like you they just name call and talk about NWO.
We are not arguing about the existence of the NWO, I believe there is a cabal that has a plan they would like to implement for anNWO. We are not arguing that.
So I will ask you what I have asked everyone else arguing with me in this thread to do one thing like I have done myself.
Go through the list of the guidances and explain to me and everyone how each one fits in with the NWO plan.
Boone has done this. I have shown how none of them do and the best arguments against me were merely that the guidestones are lying to get people to believe in them which frankly doesn't even make sense.
If you were to read all of the arguments against my list I think one of two things would happen:
1 you'd see that most people niece they are NWO so you would find comfort in the fact that you are on the side of the masses here on this site
2 you'd notice that no one has offered an intelligent rebuttal and that all the arguments are an expression of cognitive dissonance and people finding comfort only in that they have sided with the majority.
No they don't want everyone sterile. Just about 70% and they get to decide who reproduces. And they want everyone promiscuous at the moment simply to break the old structures down. Once they are in charge no such degeneracy will be available for the plebs (bad for cohesion, self control is vital for stable societies)
Eugenics. It's a thing. Look it up.
LOL 'indoctrinated with YouTube videos'? Bitch, I was studying this crap likely before you were born and I don't need some dumbass who clearly thinks they know everything from a few New Age sites. Claiming someone gets their info from YouTube vids is very millenial of you.
Books. Great things. Old texts even better. They even have bibliographies for further research.
You said it yourself. They want people sterile so they can control reproduction which pretty much points out that the guidestones are not an NWO agenda.
I've been awake for over 29!years and I can see that everything your saying, inudingbthat the guidestones are NWO comes from a video or blog.
Boone, including you would read the guidestones and conclude they are NWO. None of the guidances are inline with NWO.
Don't forget, God himself reduced the world's population in order to destroy the systems and cultures of man.
Many people forsee that a catastrophe like that is the only thing that can give humanity a chances to get on the right track.
Many people believe that mankind is going to do to itself by human folly, what God did with Noah and the flood.
Sure, the NWO also knows that it's our only chance and so they are trying to orchistrate that by taking the reduction of humanities population in their own hands, but just because other people foresee a catastrophe thelat reduces the population doesn't mean they are NWO.
You would be able to tell they were NWO by the other things they believe. You would be able to tell by the context that was in. In this case the context is in opposition to NWO ideology.
I have gone through the list and pointed out how none of those are NWO agneda and no one has even bothered to argue against me. Like you they just name call and talk about NWO.
We are not arguing about the existence of the NWO, I believe there is a cabal that has a plan they would like to implement for anNWO. We are not arguing that.
So I will ask you what I have asked everyone else arguing with me in this thread to do one thing like I have done myself.
Go through the list of the guidances and explain to me and everyone how each one fits in with the NWO plan.
Boone has done this. I have shown how none of them do and the best arguments against me were merely that the guidestones are lying to get people to believe in them which frankly doesn't even make sense.
If you were to read all of the arguments against my list I think one of two things would happen:
1 you'd see that most people niece they are NWO so you would find comfort in the fact that you are on the side of the masses here on this site
2 you'd notice that no one has offered an intelligent rebuttal and that all the arguments are an expression of cognitive dissonance and people finding comfort only in that they have sided with the majority.