It is your right to 'not entertain theories', BUT when you do that you automatically accept the narrative (which itself is a theory).
Then the narrative gets 'set in concrete' for several years while 'someone' does an investigation. Meanwhile, no one releases any information because of the 'ongoing investigation'.
Dozens (if not hundreds) of buildings in Miami have 'been cited' in the past, so that isn't any sort of 'proof'.
I'm not saying it is proven that something shady happened here, I'm just saying it's possible.
It's also possible that anything resembling evidence will be hidden from us, which means we (by default) have to accept the (unproven) narrative because there will never be 'proof' of anything. Narrative 'confirmed'.
It is your right to 'not entertain theories', BUT when you do that you automatically accept the narrative (which itself is a theory).
Then the narrative gets 'set in concrete' for several years while 'someone' does an investigation. Meanwhile, no one releases any information because of the 'ongoing investigation'.
Dozens (if not hundreds) of buildings in Miami have 'been cited' in the past, so that isn't any sort of 'proof'.
I'm not saying it is proven that something shady happened here, I'm just saying it's possible.
It's also possible that anything resembling evidence will be hidden from us, which means we (by default) have to accept the (unproven) narrative because there will never be 'proof' of anything. Narrative 'confirmed'.
Make no mistake, you are entertaining a theory.